Thursday, November 17, 2016

National Living Donor Assistance Center (NLDAC) Links

If someone you know in the U.S. needs travel assistance to be a living kidney donor, let them know about NLDAC:

enter-key-keyboard.jpg


Each year, the NLDAC Advisory Group meets to review program information and make recommendations for improvements. This year, the Advisory Group meeting was led by their new chair, Zoe Stewart, MD, PhD, MPH. We would like to thank this dedicated group of volunteers for their time and expertise: Brenda Dyson; Cathy Garvey, RN, BA, CCTC; Adam Gray, LCSW, CCTSW;  Maryl Johnson, MD; Marie Morgievich, BS, BSN, MSN, CCTC; Lisa Morrison, Kay Payne, PhD; Al Roth, PhD; Jennifer Steel, PhD; Jane Tan, MD, PhD, MS; Betsy Walsh, JD, MPH; Errol Williams; Alexander Wiseman, MD; Warren (Kip) Wright, MSW, LCSW; Mesmin Germain, MPH, MBA (Ex Officio); and Frank Holloman (Ex Officio). 
NLDAC Advisory Group and Program Team Members 
September 30th, 2016
Arlington, VA

NLDAC Survey Comments - September 2016
The Results are In words in newspaper headlines to illustrate voting or election survey or poll results reported by news outlets"I am so appreciative that this program exists to help the process run smoothly!! Thank you SO very much!"-Living Donor, Methodist Specialty & Transplant Hospital, San Antonio, TX

"Over all this was wonderful experience and I would do it again if was able."-Living Donor, Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Bethesda, MD

"Very helpful - would have been very difficult financially without the help."-Living Donor, Rochester Methodist Hospital - Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN

"You guys were amazing. I could not have donated without your help!"
-Living Donor, University of Utah Medical Center, Salt Lake City, UT
"You all do a great job. I cannot see anything to improve the NLDAC. Thank you so much for helping me and my family. Thanks!!!"
-Living Donor, University of Maryland Medical System, Baltimore, MD

"This is a wonderful program that made a huge difference in my life. It made it possible not to worry about the fact that I was not supporting the rest of my family because I was spending so much on the process. HUGE BLESSING!"-Living Donor, Abbott Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, MN

Contact Us!
If you have questions or comments about our program or need assistance completing an application, please contact the NLDAC team at Toll Free: 1-888-870-5002, Phone: 703-414-1600, Fax: 703-414-7874 or E-mail: nldac@livingdonorassistance.org. We are located in Arlington, VA and are available M-F 9:00am-5:00pm ET. NLDAC provides services via a HRSA grant awarded to the University of Arizona and the partners listed below. 

Health Resources and Services Administration | American Society of Transplant Surgeons | University of Arizona Health Sciences | Arbor Research Collaborative for Health | Washington University - Missouri | Mayo Clinic - Arizona

Funding for this project is supported by grant number U13HS07689 from the Healthcare System Bureau, Health Resources and Services Administration, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.  The contents of this electronic newsletter are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the funder.  
Educational Videos

#1 Who is Eligible for NLDAC?


#2 How to Apply for NLDAC


#3 After NLDAC Application is Approved




Worksheets English





Worksheets Spanish


Wednesday, November 16, 2016

Talk at Universidad del CEMA


El Nobel Alvin Roth en UCEMA

El miércoles 16 de noviembre a las 18 h. Alvin Roth, Nobel de Economía 2012, brindará una conferencia exclusiva en la UCEMA:Who gets what and why: the new economics of matchmaking and market design.

Una de las centrales contribuciones de Roth es haber colaborado con el desarrollo del sistema de intercambios de donaciones de riñones (en inglés, kidney paired donation), o donación renal cruzada, en los que parejas de donantes y receptores que son incompatibles buscan a otro par o pares de donantes y pacientes compatibles para realizar un intercambio, reduciendo el tiempo de espera.

Roth es un verdadero ingeniero de mercados. Es uno de los pocos economistas que tienen la capacidad de, además de ser fuerte en lo teórico, hacer desarrollos muy aplicables, que buscan mejorar el bienestar.

Encuentro organizado por la Maestría en Economía de la UCEMA. Entrada libre y gratuita en Auditorio Reconquista 775, previa inscripción. La Conferencia se brindará en inglés.

Agradecemos la gestión de la Asociación Argentina de Economía Política (AAEP), la Facultad de Ciencias Económicas de la Universidad Nacional de Tucumán y el Ente Provincial Bicentenario Tucumán 2016, que permitieron concretar la visita de Alvin Roth al país.
Here's the poster:

Tuesday, November 15, 2016

Should Compensation for Bone Marrow Donors be Legal? a panel discussion in Washington

If you're at loose ends in DC today: 
It’s a felony to compensate organ donors, but what counts as an organ is not always so clear. The stem cells contained in bone marrow are also present in the bloodstream, and are routinely extracted to be used in transplants to treat cancers and many blood and immune disorders. Should these cells be treated as an organ like bone marrow, or should the law permit compensation for blood stem cells just as it does for other non-invasive procedures like plasma or whole blood donation?
This a question the Health Resources and Services Administration is currently considering. With a substantial gap in the supply and demand for bone marrow transplants, particularly among racial minorities, how they choose to regulate will affect the lives of thousands of patients each year.
Join the Niskanen Center and the Georgetown Institute for the Study of Markets and Ethics for an expert panel on the legal, ethical and economic issues surrounding compensation for bone marrow, including:
Robert McNamara
Senior Attorney, Institute for Justice
Mario Macis
Associate Professor of Economics, Johns Hopkins Carey Business School
Peter Jaworski
Assistant Teaching Professor, Georgetown University
Doug Grant
CEO, Hemeos
Samuel Hammond
Poverty and Welfare Policy Analyst, Niskanen Center


Where:428a Russell Senate Office Building
Senate Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship Hearing Room
When:
November 15 from 3:00-4:30pm

Monday, November 14, 2016

Some unscreened NYC high schools would like to be able to choose the most interested students

Here's the story from WNYC: Theme High Schools Long to Find the Most Interested Applicants

The story talks about some of NYC's specialized high schools, like Food and Finance High School, which apparently aren't allowed to interview students, and worry that not all of the students who are assigned to them are as passionate about Food and Finance as they might be, and might object to all the dirty dishes that they'll have to wash at a cooking school.

Some of the teachers interviewed seem to think they might prefer an immediate acceptance algorithm that would assign them students who ranked them first on their preference lists.

I'm skeptical about that, but I can well imagine that it would indeed serve the school and some students well to make places for the passionate cooks. Allowing the school to interview and rank students would help with that.

HT: Jacob Leshno

Sunday, November 13, 2016

Interviews in Brazilian newspapers about Who Gets What and Why

Here are two interviews in connection with the Portuguese translation of Who Gets What and Why.

In Folha de S.Paulo:
Prêmio Nobel analisa mercados em que só o dinheiro não basta
(Nobel Prize analyzes markets where only money is not enough)

In O Globo: Alvin Roth afirma ver os mercados até em aplicativos como o Tinder
(Alvin Roth says see the markets even in applications like Tinder)



Roth, Alvin E. Como funcionam os mercados: A nova economia das combinações e do desenho de mercado. Portfolio-Penguin, 2016.

Saturday, November 12, 2016

Repugnance and state elections...right to die, and marijuana

Several repugnant transactions became less so (at least they moved from illegal to legal) along with the other results of last Tuesday's elections.

After Colorado, right-to-die movement eyes new battlegrounds

"By an overwhelming vote Tuesday, Coloradans approved a ballot initiative allowing physicians to prescribe lethal drugs to mentally fit, terminally ill adults who want to end their lives. Colorado is the sixth state to allow the practice, following Oregon, Washington, Montana, Vermont and California. Washington, D.C., is poised to approve similar legislation as soon as this month.
Colorado’s ballot initiative proposal met resistance from religious groups with moral objections and disability advocates leery of abuse of power. Opponents raised over $2.6 million, the bulk of which came from the Archdiocese of Denver. Supporters, who argued that terminally ill patients deserve the option to “die with dignity,” raised over $5.4 million, mostly from the Compassion & Choices Action Network."
**********
 Arizona rejected marijuana legalization, and in Maine it passed by a hair, with a 50.2 percent majority finally counted on Thursday. Marijuana is now legal in some form in many more American states, with perhaps a quarter of the population. The Guardian notes the results of Tuesday's ballots...

"Approved: California voters approved recreational marijuana, a huge victory in the fight for cannabis legalization, paving the way for the largest commercial pot market in the US.
Approved: Massachusetts also voted for recreational pot, extending legal weed from coast to coast.
Approved: Nevada became the third state to approve a recreational cannabis law, making the west an even stronger region for marijuana sales.
Approved: Earlier in the night, Florida voters passed a constitutional amendment to legalize medical marijuana, the first victory in a string of high-profile cannabis measures on Tuesday’s state ballots.
Approved: North Dakota was the second state to approve medical weed, with the approval of Measure 5, which approves the use of marijuana to treat a number of diseases, including cancer, Aids, epilepsy and hepatitis C.
Approved: Arkansas also passed a medical cannabis measure that would allow patients with specific conditions to buy medicine from dispensaries licensed by the government.
Rejected: Arizona was the first state to vote against its marijuana measure, with the news early on Wednesday morning that voters have rejected Proposition 205. The measure would have legalized recreational pot.
Approved: Montana residents voted to expand the state’s medical marijuana system with the passage of Initiative 182, which removes limits on the number of patients providers can serve. Proponents of the measure argued that the existing restrictions blocked patients from accessing care.
Advocates and opponents agree that California’s Proposition 64 is the most important cannabis measure America has seen and could be an international game-changer for marijuana policy in the US.
California, which recently overtook the UK to have the fifth largest economy in the world, is expected to have a recreational marijuana market greater than Colorado, Washington, Oregon and Alaska combined, said Ethan Nadelmann, executive director of the Drug Policy Alliance.
“When I talk to everybody from allies to government officials in Mexico and I ask them what’s it going to take to transform the debate,” he said, “the response to me is when California legalizes marijuana.”
Too close to call: As of Wednesday afternoon, a recreational measure in Maine was still too close to call.
Colorado and Washington became the first states to legalize recreational marijuana in 2012, paving the way for Oregon, and Alaska to follow suit.
As medical and retail cannabis operations have spread across the US, legal marijuana has become the fastest-growing industry in the US, with some analysts projecting sales to reach $22bn by 2020."

Friday, November 11, 2016

Designing privacy (differential privacy) at the Institute for Advanced Study


Differential privacy disentangles learning about a dataset as a whole from learning about an individual data contributor. Just now entering practice on a global scale, the demand for advanced differential privacy techniques and knowledge of basic skills is pressing. This symposium will provide an in-depth look at the current context for privacy-preserving statistical data analysis and an agenda for future research. This event is organized by Cynthia Dwork, of Microsoft Research, with support from the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation.
Speakers include:
Helen Nissenbaum, Cornell Tech and NYU
Aaron Roth, University of Pennsylvania
Guy Rothblum, Weizmann Institute
Kunal Talwar, Google Brain
Jonathan Ullman, Northeastern University

Thursday, November 10, 2016

2017 CSWEP Junior Mentoring Breakfasts at the Chicago AEA meetings in January

 The American Economic Association's Committee on the Status of Women in the Economics Profession (CSWEP) is pleased to announce the 5th Annual Mentoring Breakfasts for Junior Faculty to be held at the 2017 AEA/ASSA Meetings in Chicago. At these informal meet and greet events, senior economists (predominately senior women) will be on hand to provide mentoring and networking opportunities.  Junior economists are invited to drop in with questions on topics such as publishing, research, teaching, grant writing, networking, job search, career paths, work-life balance and the tenure process. Rotation of mentees throughout the event is encouraged so that they may have the opportunity to connect with the greatest number of mentors.  This mentoring experience is intended for junior economists who have completed their PhD in the past 6 years or graduate students who are on the job market.  The event is open to both males and females.  A light continental breakfast will be provided.
CSWEP will host two sessions. Please see below for registration details.

Friday, Jan. 6, 2017, 8:00 AM – 10:00 AM
Hyatt Regency Chicago, Regency B
Session I Registration
Eventbrite - CSWEP 2017 Mentoring Breakfast for Junior Economists-1/6/2017

Sunday, Jan. 8, 2017, 8:00 AM – 10:00 AM
Hyatt Regency Chicago, Regency B
Session II Registration
Eventbrite - CSWEP 2017 Mentoring Breakfast for Junior Economists-1/8/2017


Senior economists who are interested in serving as mentors are asked to send an email to cswep@econ.ucsb.edu indicating the date(s) they are able to attend.
We hope to see you there!

Wednesday, November 9, 2016

And in other election news...marijuana

What can I say? It looks like we may need it...
Californians Legalize Marijuana in Vote That Could Echo Nationally

"California, Massachusetts and Nevada legalized marijuana on Tuesday in what advocates said was a reflection of the country’s changing attitude toward the drug.

Leading up to the election, recreational marijuana use was legal in four states: Alaska, Colorado, Oregon and Washington, along with Washington, D.C.

With the addition of California, Massachusetts and Nevada, the percentage of Americans living in states where marijuana use is legal for adults rose above 20 percent, from 5 percent."

Tuesday, November 8, 2016

What is Happening in Game Theory? in the JEP

The Fall 2016 Journal of Economic Perspectives contains a
Symposium: What is Happening in Game Theory?

Game Theory in Economics and Beyond (#6)
Larry Samuelson
New Directions for Modelling Strategic Behavior: Game-Theoretic Models of Communication, Coordination, and Cooperation in Economic Relationships (#7)
Vincent P. Crawford
Whither Game Theory? Towards a Theory of Learning in Games (#8)
Drew Fudenberg and David K. Levine

Monday, November 7, 2016

Sociology of high frequency trading

The Journal Economy and Society has a special issue on Cultures of High-Frequency Trading, which includes the following articles:


*************
A related working paper I enjoyed reading, on Donald MacKenzie's website:

How Algorithms Interact: Goffman’s ‘Interaction Order’ in Automated Trading
Donald MacKenzie
April 2016

Sunday, November 6, 2016

A seller's guide to the U.S. market for sperm

The NY Times has some advice for potential sellers...

10 Things to Know About Being a Sperm Donor

"Your odds of getting into Harvard or Stanford are higher than your chances of being accepted as a donor at the major sperm banks.

California Cryobank and Fairfax Cryobank, the nation’s two largest sperm banks, take only about one in 100 applicants. Some deal-breakers: a low sperm count, an iffy health history or sperm that don’t do well after freezing.

If you’re short, forget about it.

...

You’ll never know how many children you have fathered.

There’s no legal limit, but the biggest sperm banks have policies that one donor’s sperm will not be allowed to sire children for more than 25 to 30 different “family units.” But some families may have two or three children with the donor’s sperm, and others may not report a birth, so they would not be counted in that limit. Some men who have joined the Donor Sibling Registry, a site where donors and their children can connect, have been surprised and disturbed to discover that they have dozens of offspring.

You may or may not get to meet them.

Sperm donors usually have the option to remain anonymous, or to agree that the children can get in touch when they turn 18. There has been a growing recognition of children’s rights to know their genetic parents — and recently a trend toward donor willingness to be identified. Even anonymous donors are increasingly being identified by curious children as genetic testing becomes cheaper and more common."

Saturday, November 5, 2016

In Britain, National Sperm Bank stops recruiting donors

The Telegraph has the story: National Sperm Bank stops recruiting donors after just two years

"The National Sperm Bank (NSB) was a joint project run by the National Gamete Donation Trust (NGDT) and the Birmingham Women’s Fertility Centre and launched in October 2014 with a £77,000 grant from the Department of Health.
It was hoped the service would plug the gap in the shortage of donors and prevent couples being forced to look for sperm from overseas.
The bank hoped to be self-sufficient within a year but because the full donor process takes up to 18 months they were unable to generate enough income to keep going.
Although they only managed to recruit seven viable donors, experts said it was the business model that proved their ultimate downfall.
...
"For every 100 men who enquire about being a donor, only 4 or 5 are ultimately accepted.
The Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority estimate that 2,000 children are born every year in the UK using donated eggs, sperm or embryos and there are around licensed UK clinics performing sperm donor insemination.
But the majority of clinics are based in London and the south-east of England and treatment can be expensive. The cost of donor sperm from the UK's largest sperm bank, the London Sperm Bank, is currently £950. In contrast the National Sperm bank was proposing to charge £300 per insemination.
...
"The bank has also suffered because since 2005 the children of donors have a right to learn the identity of their fathers when they turn 18. The numbers of men willing to donate sperm has fallen dramatically since their anonymity was removed."