The AJB invites commentaries on its target articles, and the comments on our article on payments in human infection challenge trials have now appeared. (If I've done this right, you can read them by clicking on the links below.) This is from The American Journal of Bioethics, Volume 21, Issue 3 (2021)
Our target article points out that while much of the medical ethics literature focuses on the claim that payments can subject potential participants, particularly poor people, to undue influence or coercion by being too large, there can be a countervailing concern that payments that are too small can be exploitative, and that this might often be the greater ethical concern.
The commentaries are all brief, but there are nine of them, so let me recommend to my regular market design readers that two that might be rewarding to begin with are those by Julian Savulescu, and by Seán O’Neill McPartlin & Josh Morrison.
- 906Views
- 9CrossRef citations
- 215Altmetric
- 7Views
- 0CrossRef citations
- 0Altmetric
- 2Views
- 0CrossRef citations
- 3Altmetric
- 5Views
- 0CrossRef citations
- 7Altmetric
- 10Views
- 0CrossRef citations
- 0Altmetric
- 2Views
- 0CrossRef citations
- 0Altmetric
- 13Views
- 0CrossRef citations
- 0Altmetric
- 0Views
- 0CrossRef citations
- 2Altmetric
- 7Views
- 0CrossRef citations
- 1Altmetric
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment