It turns out that Cornell had no rule preventing students from skinning bears in a communal dormitory kitchen. But now they do. (A lot of regulation works like that... keep an eye on AI...)
Sunday, August 9, 2026
Friday, July 10, 2026
What crops compete with wine grapes? (Spoiler, it's houses.)
As the wine business faces headwinds, both from climate change and from reduction in American alcohol consumption, vineyards are changing hands. What is the new crop? Houses...
The Mercury News has the story:
Housing plans in pricey Saratoga get lift from $100 million-plus deal
Homes are slated to be built on site of century-old vineyard By George Avalos
"The group bought the land in June 2025 for $30.6 million and embarked on a process to secure approval for a residential project on the property, which began operating as a vineyard around 1920.
Initially, the Wilson-led group proposed a 231-unit project known as Vineyard One at the corner of Chester Avenue and Allendale Avenue.
A series of negotiations with Saratoga planners and leaders eventually downsized the project to the current proposal that envisions a 64-unit housing development.
Of the 64 homes, 52 will be single-family residences for sale and 12 will be accessory dwelling units. Six of the ADUs will be rented to very low-income households, and six will be rented to moderate-income households, planning files show.
...
"The purchase and development plans have materialized at a time when the median price of a home in Saratoga is around $3.9 million, far higher than the California median price of $930,260 and the Santa Clara County median home price of $1.6 million, according to Redfin.
Saturday, July 4, 2026
Coffee (and) science: medicine and climate change
First the good medical news for coffee drinkers, from MedpageToday and the journal Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology:
Coffee Lovers and Their Livers Can Celebrate, Study Suggests — Five or more cups a day linked to the greatest benefit by Mike Bassett, Staff Writer, MedPage Today
"Coffee consumption has been linked to a number of health benefits, such as reduced risks of dementia, head and neck cancer, and all-cause and cardiovascular mortality.
According to data from the U.K. Biobank, a higher intake of coffee was associated with lower risks of cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma, and liver-related mortality.
These associations persisted for both caffeinated and decaffeinated coffee, and for unsweetened and sweetened coffee."
Here's the journal article: Kim H, Rezaee-Zavareh M, Wang Y ...
Coffee Consumption and Improved Liver Outcomes: Clinical, Imaging, and Proteomic Evidence From the UK Biobank, Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 2026;
#######
And here's more sobering news, published in Nature, about how climate change threatens coffee cultivation:
"Nearly all the 10 million tonnes of coffee beans consumed annually around the world come from two plant species: the strong and often bitter robusta (Coffea canephora) and the more delicate-tasting arabica (Coffea arabica). Unfortunately, arabica suffers or dies when temperatures rise just a few degrees1, and robusta requires massive amounts of water and its yields drop drastically in a drought.
...
"Tesfaye says that scientists, of all people, should care about coffee’s future, not just because science is good for coffee, but because coffee is good for science, too. “Many discoveries and knowledge are generated after having a cup of coffee.”
Tuesday, June 16, 2026
A chef makes the case for foie gras, and addresses the concerns regarding animal welfare
The Washington Post has the story.
Why I’m proud to serve foie gras. But first, let me take your concerns seriously. By Bart Hutchins
Bart Hutchins is the chef and owner of Butterworth’s in Washington, D.C.
"There is now a proposed ballot initiative moving through Washington that would ban foie gras entirely. No producing it, no selling or serving it. Fines between $1,000 and $5,000 per violation. License suspension for repeat offenses
...
""I am asking you to not sign the petition. But first I want to do something the other side rarely does, which is to take their concerns seriously.
"Gavage — force-feeding through a tube inserted down a bird’s throat — looks terrible. I know because I have seen it. I understand completely why someone sees footage of it and reacts with horror. If you imagine the same thing done to human beings, it looks like violence.
"But here is what I also know, and what the activists with the megaphones do not know and do not want to know because it would complicate the argument they have decided to make.
...
' A duck’s esophagus, where the gavage tube is inserted, is desensitized, without a gag reflex, and it is capable of swallowing whole crustaceans and scaly fish in the wild. Its windpipe is separate from the esophagus, meaning the gavage process has no impact on breathing. More importantly, this overfeeding is something the bird does naturally. Before their annual migration, ducks gorge — they stuff themselves with excess food. The calories are stored as fat, not only in the liver but in the expanded esophagus. (The verb “gorge” comes from this behavior.) What foie gras farming does is amplify a natural biological process rather than invent a cruel one .
...
"The producer I buy foie gras from exemplifies the kind of care and attention good farming demands. Their ducks are raised for 15 weeks, about twice the poultry industry standard, in open barns, on a vegetarian diet. Force-feeding by hand happens three times a day for the final three weeks. Each feeding takes approximately 1½ seconds, and, from my observation, the ducks barely seem to notice it."
#######
My previous posts about foie gras.
Saturday, April 25, 2026
Night markets in Taiwan
Night markets in Taiwan are like open-air food courts in which each seller sells a single food preparation.
This last photo, of a selection of freshly made breads that look like brains, reminded me of the old joke about why economists' brains are so expensive per ounce.
Monday, September 29, 2025
Repugnance and consequence-insensitivity (in connection to opposition to genetically-engineered food)
There is a well developed literature on repugnance connected to food, and here is a recent, interesting example that focuses on the relationship between consequence-insensitivity and other correlates of moral outrage.
Inbar, Yoel, Sydney E. Scott, and Paul Rozin. "Moral opposition to genetically engineered food in the United States, France, and Germany." Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences (2025).
ABSTRACT: "When people are morally opposed to a practice, they often profess to be consequence-insensitive—that is, they say that they think it ought to be prohibited regardless of the risks and benefits. We investigate consequence-insensitive opposition to genetically engineered (GE) food in France, Germany, and the United States. Using nationally representative samples (total N = 1599), we find that most GE food opponents in all three countries are consequence-insensitive (France: 93.1%; Germany: 87.4%; United States: 81.3%). Consequence-insensitive opponents differ from other opponents in other ways consistent with their holding moral beliefs. They are more likely to display other properties of sacred moral values, like quantity insensitivity and universalism. They also see GE food as more personally important, are less willing to consume it, are more in favor of policies restricting it, and are more willing to engage in activism against it."
"In their research on moral GE food opposition in the United States, Scott et al. [15] asked par “It is equally wrong to allow some of this to happen as
to allow twice as much to happen. The amount doesn't matter” (quantity
insensitivity); and “This would be wrong even in a country where
everyone thought it was not wrong” (universalism)ticipants three questions that were originally developed by Baron and Spranca [14] for their research on sacred values (which they call “protected values”). Scott et al.’s primary analyses focused on the consequence-insensitivity question, which asked whether GE food “should be prohibited no matter how great the benefits and minor the risks from allowing it.” Likewise, we here focus on the consequence-insensitivity item and test whether responses to other questions theoretically related to sacred values differ between consequence-sensitive and consequence-insensitive opponents. In the current study, we used two other items related to sacred values that were previously used in Scott et al.: “It is equally wrong to allow some of this to happen as to allow twice as much to happen. The amount doesn't matter” (quantity insensitivity); and “This would be wrong even in a country where everyone thought it was not wrong” (universalism). We also added two new exploratory items that were intended to tap moral outrage at the juxtaposition of secular (financial) considerations with sacred values [19]: “I am offended by the idea of putting a monetary price on allowing this”; and “It is morally wrong to put a monetary price on allowing this practice.” For each of these items, we test whether responses differ between consequence-sensitive and consequence-insensitive opponents. If consequence-insensitive opponents are more likely to display quantity insensitivity, universalism, and moral outrage at sacred-secular tradeoffs than consequence-sensitive opponents, then this would provide further evidence that consequence-insensitive opponents moralize GE food more than consequence-sensitive opponents."
Sunday, August 31, 2025
Abhijit Banerjee's column on food and economics, in The Times of India
Abhijit Banerjee writes a monthly column on food (cooking it and eating it) and economics, in The Times of India
You can see them all at the link, but here's a recent example:
Trade wars and chocolate bars, what India of the 1970s can teach Trump May 31, 2025, Abhijit Banerjee in Tasting Economics
"One advantage/disadvantage of being old is that I lived through what is history to so many others. President Trump adores William McKinley, the 25th US president, for his tariffs, but at 78, he is way too young to have lived behind a properly high tariff wall. I, on the other hand, lived in the India of the 1970s, when we had managed to kill almost all international trade through a combination of tariffs and other rules for importing (non-tariff barriers in trade parlance).
I mostly experienced trade barriers through the important lens of chocolate."
Sunday, August 24, 2025
Meat and dairy allergy ( to alpha-gal), ticks and gene-modified pigs
A previously rare allergy to a sugar molecule called alpha-gal, found in almost all mammals but humans, is now being spread by tick bites. But alpha-gal is also the sugar that is genetically engineered out of pigs that are being bred for xenotransplants. So there may be a secondary market for pork chops from those pigs...
‘We can no longer eat burgers or ice cream — all because of a tick bite’
A bug-borne disease has taken over Martha’s Vineyard and is turning people vegan, locals claim. by Samuel Lovett
"Sufferers cannot eat any food products that contains alpha-gal, a sugar molecule carried by the lone star tick and which is present in all mammals — except humans and some monkeys. This means cheeses, milk and meats from beef to venison are all off the menu. For some, even white sugar cannot be tolerated because it is processed using animal-bone char.
"Alpha-gal symptoms including hives, stomach cramps, vomiting and breathlessness often start to appear several hours after eating foods containing the molecule, giving the syndrome its nickname “the midnight allergy”.
...
"Although the prevalence of alpha-gal syndrome on Martha’s Vineyard has rocketed in recent years, the island is “definitely not the worst off”, said Roden-Reynolds. Data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention indicates that the Midwest has the highest rates per capita, and the agency estimates that about 450,000 people are living with the disease in the US."
Saturday, August 23, 2025
Chocolate fermentation and its microbiome (coming to desserts near you)
The Guardian brings us the latest breakthrough in chocolate science:
Scientists claim to have unlocked ‘secret sauce’ needed for fine chocolate
Results of studying cocoa bean fermentation in Colombia could pave way to manipulate flavour, say researchers by Nicola Davis
"Whether you enjoy an aromatic bar with notes of caramel or something less fancy, chocolate can have many tastes. Now researchers say they have shed fresh light on a key ingredient that could open the door to new flavours.
They claim to have unpicked how and why the bacteria and fungi involved in the fermentation of cocoa beans influence the flavour of chocolate.
“We understand now what microbes we need and what they’re doing. And I think that opens up the opportunity … to be a lot more directed [about] how we make our chocolate in terms of its flavour,” said Prof David Salt, co-author of the work from the University of Nottingham.
Writing in the journal Nature Microbiology, the team report how they studied beans fermented at cocoa farms in three different regions of Colombia – Santander, Huila and Antioquia.
...
"The team then used genetic sequencing to identify the microbes involved in cocoa bean fermentation from multiple sites in Colombia and beyond, explore the genes they contained, and hence identify the flavour substances they could produce during fermentation.
As a result, the researchers identified nine microbes that together were predicted to produce the notes of a fine flavour cocoa. They then introduced this community to sterile cocoa beans, and allowed them to ferment.
The upshot, said Salt, was a cocoa with floral, fruity and citrus notes and a recognisable cocoa flavour but with reduced astringency and bitterness."
Sunday, August 17, 2025
Cat food, for big cats in zoos (you could call it pet food)
Zoos are complicated.
Here's the story from NPR:
A zoo in Denmark asked patrons to donate their pets. Not as attractions, but for food By Alana Wise
"In a post on Facebook, the Aalborg Zoo in Denmark asked people to donate unwanted pets that would be "gently euthanized" and fed to predators in captivity.
...
"The zoo also accepts horses as part of its fodder program.
"The Facebook post quickly became a battleground between commenters who were appalled at the concept of euthanizing healthy pets for animal feed, and those who applauded the zoo for its method of maintaining a practical food supply for its animals.
...
"The Aalborg Zoo says dogs and cats are excluded from the program. Donatable animals are limited to chickens, rabbits, guinea pigs, and horses, it says, adding that this is a practice it has maintained with patrons for years.
"When keeping carnivores, it is necessary to provide them with meat, preferably with fur, bones, etc., to give them as natural a diet as possible," zoo Deputy Director Pia Nielsen said in a statement to NPR.
"Therefore, it makes sense to allow animals that need to be euthanized for various reasons to be of use in this way. In Denmark, this practice is common, and many of our guests and partners appreciate the opportunity to contribute," Nielsen added."
Wednesday, July 16, 2025
Incinerating food aid
Here's a story from The Atlantic about a decision that captures the Trump administration's policies towards food aid, carbon emissions, and the Biden administration:
"Five months into its unprecedented dismantling of foreign-aid programs, the Trump administration has given the order to incinerate food instead of sending it to people abroad who need it. Nearly 500 metric tons of emergency food—enough to feed about 1.5 million children for a week—are set to expire tomorrow, according to current and former government employees with direct knowledge of the rations. Within weeks, two of those sources told me, the food, meant for children in Afghanistan and Pakistan, will be ash.
...
"Sometime near the end of the Biden administration, USAID spent about $800,000 on the high-energy biscuits,"
Tuesday, July 15, 2025
Cellular agriculture points the way to removing killing from the food chain
No bones, no scales, no problem: The first lab-grown salmon sold in the U.S. Wildtype’s cell-cultivated salmon is the first seafood to earn FDA approval, marking a significant milestone for the alternative protein industry. By Allyson Chiu
"The Coho salmon, pinkish orange and streaked with lines of white fat, wasn’t wild-caught in Alaska or farmed in Chile. It comes from cells grown in tanks at a former microbrewery in San Francisco, and in late May it became the first cell-cultured seafood to receive safety approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.
...
"At least two lab-grown chicken products have previously gotten the FDA’s green light. But the okay for the salmon, made by California-based Wildtype, marks a significant milestone for the alternative protein industry, which has been working to produce substitutes for traditional meat and fish that can help meet the world’s growing demand for food while minimizing environmental and climate impacts. "
Friday, May 9, 2025
Cacao, cocoa, and coca (Etymology meets botany, agriculture and health)
Cocoa and cacao and coca? Which one of these three things is different from the other two? (I'll leave the harder question of milk versus dark chocolate to the end of the post...)
from Microsoft copilot:
"Coca refers to the Erythroxylum coca plant, native to South America. Its leaves have been traditionally used by indigenous cultures for medicinal and stimulant purposes. Coca contains cocaine alkaloids, which can be extracted to produce the drug cocaine. However, when consumed in its natural form—such as in teas or chewed leaves—it has mild stimulant effects similar to caffeine
"Cocoa and cacao come from...the Theobroma cacao tree—but they go through different processing methods, leading to distinct characteristics.
Cacao refers to the raw and less processed version of the seed from the cacao tree. It is typically cold-pressed to preserve its natural enzymes, antioxidants, and nutrients. Cacao nibs and powder have a slightly bitter and earthy flavor, making them popular in health-conscious recipes.
Cocoa, on the other hand, is cacao that has been roasted"
What is the etymology of cocoa and cacao?
"The word cacao comes from the Nahuatl (Aztec) word "cacahuatl," which means "cocoa bean". The cacao tree is native to Central and South America, and its cultivation dates back to at least 1500 BCE among the Mayans and Aztecs.
The word cocoa, on the other hand, is actually a corruption of "cacao" that emerged in English around the 18th century. The confusion likely arose due to the similarity between "cacao" and "coco" (which refers to the coconut), and the mistake was reinforced when dictionary printers accidentally merged the entries for "cocoa" and "coco". By the early 1800s, "cocoa" had become the standard spelling.
So, while "cacao" is the original term, "cocoa" became the more commonly used word in English, especially when referring to processed products like cocoa powder.
#########
Now for the important news on chocolate science from Harvard's School of Public Health:
Eating dark chocolate linked with reduced risk of type 2 diabetes By Maya Brownstein
"Our findings suggest that not all chocolate is created equal,” said lead author Binkai Liu, doctoral student at the Harvard Kenneth C. Griffin Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, studying in the Harvard Chan School Department of Nutrition. “For anyone who loves chocolate, this is a reminder that making small choices, like choosing dark chocolate over milk chocolate, can make a positive difference to their health.”
The study was published online Dec. 4 in The BMJ.
Monday, April 28, 2025
Drinking less but paying more
Bloomberg has the story:
We May Have Already Hit Peak Booze. A habit as old as civilization is fading from our society. By David Fickling
Monday, April 21, 2025
Food: from luxuries to tragedies--chocolate and peanut butter at the opposite ends of human welfare
Below are two stories about food, that couldn't be more different (although the foods, chocolate and peanut butter, have some connection when times are good).
The (sort of) luxury story, from the Guardian comes with a picture of bonbons:
US chocolate prices surge amid soaring cocoa costs and tariffs
Price of cocoa – chocolate’s key ingredient – has climbed over past year and tariffs on imports will keep prices high by Lauren Aratani
And here's the tragedy, reported on in The Atlantic
‘In Three Months, Half of Them Will Be Dead’
Elon Musk promised to preserve lifesaving aid to foreign children. Then the Trump administration quietly canceled it. By Hana Kiros
"As DOGE was gutting USAID in February, it alarmed the global-health community by issuing stop-work orders to the two American companies that make a lifesaving peanut paste widely recognized as the best treatment for malnutrition"
...
"The move reneged on an agreement to provide about 3 million children with emergency paste over approximately the next year. What’s more, according to the two companies, the administration has also not awarded separate contracts to shipping companies, leaving much of the food assured by the original reinstated contracts stuck in the United States."
Monday, February 17, 2025
Climate crisis contributing to chocolate market meltdown
The canary in the coalmine that is climate change is starting to show important signs of stress.
The Guardian has this story:
"The climate crisis drove weeks of high temperatures in the west African region responsible for about 70% of global cacao production, hitting harvests and probably causing further record chocolate prices, researchers have said.
Farmers in the region have struggled with heat, disease and unusual rainfall in recent years, which have contributed to falling production.
The decline has resulted in an increase in the price of cocoa, which is produced from the beans of the cacao tree and is the main ingredient in chocolate.
A new report found that “climate change, due primarily to burning oil, coal and methane gas, is causing hotter temperatures to become more frequent” in places such as the Ivory Coast, Ghana, Cameroon and Nigeria.
The study, by the independent research group Climate Central, found the trend was particularly marked in Ivory Coast and Ghana, the two biggest cacao producers."
Tuesday, September 3, 2024
It's illegal to sell cicada infused liquor in Illinois
Alcohol and insects don't mix in Illinois.
The Chicago Sun Times has the story:
Suburban brewery fined for selling cicada-infused Malört shot. Noon Whistle Brewing garnered headlines for selling the creative drink during the rare overlap of two cicada broods. But it turns out the shot wasn’t just disgusting — it was also illegal. By David Struett
########
It's a good think the Illinois Liquor Control Commission wasn't running the IRB that approved Sandro Ambuehl's experiment that involved eating insects.
Sunday, March 10, 2024
Saturday, July 20, 2024
Black markets in everything bagels (in S. Korea)
South Korea is not a hub of everything bagels, it turns out. In fact they are banned.
The NYT has the story:
Why Everything Bagel Seasoning Was Banned in South Korea. The seasoning is sold by Trader Joe’s, a brand whose popularity has skyrocketed in the region in recent years.By Eve Sampson
"Food containing poppy seeds, “including popular bagel seasoning blends,” is considered contraband in South Korea, according to the U.S. Embassy, making the coveted topping a forbidden treat.
...
"As more travelers have tried to bring the popular seasoning mix into South Korea, local news and social media sites have reported in recent weeks on an increase in confiscations at airports.
"Poppy seeds are not opiates but may be contaminated by the plant’s fluid, which contains opiates, when they are harvested.
...
"In South Korea, poppy seeds are banned because they are considered a narcotic.
...
"South Korea is among the few countries with laws regulating poppy seeds. The United Arab Emirates bans the seed, and Singapore requires anyone wishing to import poppy seeds to submit a sample for opiate testing.
"In the United States, there has also been mixed messaging about poppy seeds. In 2023, the Department of Defense warned members of the military that eating poppy seeds could result in a positive drug test, despite the military previously feeding service members poppy seed breads in ready-to-eat meals."
Sunday, May 5, 2024
Baby formula and U.S. supply chains
Martha Gershon points me to her latest column, to be followed in due time by a book on feeding babies in America.
The U.S. needs a reliable supply of baby formula. A new bill in Congress can help By Martha Gershun and Rosa DeLauro May 2, 2024
"Here’s the background: In February 2022, Abbott recalled three brands of its baby formula after four babies became sick with bacterial infections after consuming the company’s formula. When a Food and Drug Administration inspection uncovered traces of a potentially deadly bacteria in Abbott’s main production plant in Sturgis, Mich., the company shut down the plant, which at the time produced more than 40% of U.S. formula. The shutdown caused cascading supply chain problems, creating a severe shortage of baby formula that lasted more than a year."
Sunday, March 10, 2024
Does high pay equal "undue inducement"? An experiment by Sandro Ambuehl
Here's an experiment about repugnant transactions, by Sandro Ambuehl.
Ambuehl, Sandro, "An experimental test of whether financial incentives constitute undue inducement in decision-making." Nature Human Behavior (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-024-01817-8
Abstract: Around the world, laws limit the incentives that can be paid for transactions such as human research participation, egg donation or gestational surrogacy. A key reason is concerns about ‘undue inducement’—the influential but empirically untested hypothesis that incentives can cause harm by distorting individual decision-making. Here I present two experiments (n = 671 and n = 406), including one based on a highly visceral transaction (eating insects). Incentives caused biased information search—participants offered a higher incentive to comply more often sought encouragement to do so. However, I demonstrate theoretically that such behaviour does not prove that incentives have harmful effects; it is consistent with Bayesian rationality. Empirically, although a substantial minority of participants made bad decisions, incentives did not magnify them in a way that would suggest allowing a transaction but capping incentives. Under the conditions of this experiment, there was no evidence that higher incentives could undermine welfare for transactions that are permissible at low incentives.
"Given the potentially high costs of preventing voluntary transactions, experiments paralleling those reported here should be conducted in the field. Unless their results differ drastically from the current ones, the rules and guidelines restricting incentives due to undue inducement concerns should be reconsidered."





