Congratulations, Alex.
Monday, March 27, 2023
Sunday, March 26, 2023
The economics and politics of compensating kidney donors, by McCormick and Held
Political feasibility is an unavoidable consideration in any discussion of compensating kidney donors. McCormick and Held take the latest a stab at it.
How to End the Kidney Shortage. Few if any of these news stories lamenting the kidney shortage or touting hightech breakthroughs mention that we already have a solution to the shortage: compensating kidney donors to induce more supply By Frank McCormick and Philip J. Held, SPRING 2023 • REGULATION (CATO Institute).
"A crucial question remains: what level of compensation should the government offer to kidney donors? The answer is a political judgment call that involves the tradeoff between the number of patients saved from premature death and the probability of getting a particular law or regulation changed.
Saturday, March 25, 2023
Junk Fees and Related Pricing Practices
The White House is taking interest in hidden fees, both because they interfere with competition on price (e.g. when Ticketmaster reveals fees only as someone tries to complete a purchase), and because they sometimes seem unconscionable. Here's a White House statement.
The President’s Initiative on Junk Fees and Related Pricing Practices
"The Biden-Harris Administration is taking action on junk fees that hurt Americans’ pocketbooks and the economy."
"Exploitative or predatory fees. Excessive fees that target consumers who have limited alternative options – because they are locked into a product or service, or are otherwise economically vulnerable – can likewise impose a financial burden. As the CFPB explains, a sign of exploitative fees is that they “far exceed the marginal cost of the service they purport to cover.” Bank overdraft fees, which greatly exceed the bank’s cost of credit, and surprise “termination fees” are leading examples."
HT: Susan Athey
********
Regarding bank overdraft fees, my sense is that these drive lots of people away from the formal banking system and into the hands of high-interest-rate check cashing and payday loan services. Since we already regulate some debit card fees, I wonder if banks can't be encouraged to have some kind of debit-card-only "checking" accounts. Those would be able to prevent overdrafts, so they should be very cheap to administer, and would allow people to avoid paying very high fees and interest rates to non-bank financial services.
Friday, March 24, 2023
Alcohol and race in Australia
In the U.S. we certainly have a complicated history around both race and alcohol, but in Australia there may be even more complications, as a recent (limited) ban on alcohol and aborigines is reinstated.
The NY Times has the story
Authorities Reinstate Alcohol Ban for Aboriginal Australians. The reaction to a rise in crime has renewed hard questions about race and control, and about the open wounds of discrimination. By Yan Zhuang
"Mr. Shaw lives in what the government has deemed a “prescribed area,” an Aboriginal town camp where from 2007 until last year it was illegal to possess alcohol, part of a set of extraordinary raced-based interventions into the lives of Indigenous Australians.
"Last July, the Northern Territory let the alcohol ban expire for hundreds of Aboriginal communities, calling it racist. But little had been done in the intervening years to address the communities’ severe underlying disadvantage. Once alcohol flowed again, there was an explosion of crime in Alice Springs widely attributed to Aboriginal people. Local and federal politicians reinstated the ban late last month.
...
"For those who believe that the country’s largely white leadership should not dictate the decisions of Aboriginal people, the alcohol ban’s return replicates the effects of colonialism and disempowers communities. Others argue that the benefits, like reducing domestic violence and other harms to the most vulnerable, can outweigh the discriminatory effects.
...
"According to the Northern Territory police, commercial breaks-ins, property damage, assaults related to domestic violence and alcohol-related assaults all rose by about or by more than 50 percent from 2021 to 2022. Australia does not break down crime data by race, but politicians and Aboriginal groups themselves have attributed the increase largely to Indigenous people.
"This was a preventable situation,” said Donna Ah Chee, the chief executive of one of these organizations, the Central Australian Aboriginal Congress. “It was Aboriginal women, families and children that were actually paying the price,” she added.
"The organization was among those that called for a resumption of the ban as an immediate step while long-term solutions were developed to address the underlying drivers of destructive drinking. Ms. Ah Chee said she considered the policy to be “positive discrimination” in protecting those most vulnerable."
**********
Of course bans in one jurisdiction can have spillovers into others. Here's a story from the Australian Broadcasting Corporation:
Katherine reports rise in transient visitors since return of Alice Springs alcohol restrictions By Matt Garrick and Max Rowley
"An outback town struggling with crime and homelessness is seeing an influx of transient visitors, which some believe is a direct impact of new alcohol restrictions in Alice Springs."
Thursday, March 23, 2023
Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) Announces Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network Modernization Initiative.
Here's a long awaited HRSA announcement, indicating their intent to modernize the deceased organ procurement and allocation system in the U.S. It's still a bit short on details, but specifically mentions budget increases. In the future it will apparently issue Requests for Proposals from organizations willing to bid on parts of the transplantation allocation system, including software. (I hope HRSA is also thinking about how organ allocation policies will be revised and kept up to date in the future, including the possibility of experimenting with proposed improvements on a regular basis.)
The press release:
HRSA Announces Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network Modernization Initiative. Initiative includes the release of new organ donor and transplant data; prioritization of modernization of the OPTN IT system; and call for Congress to make specific reforms in the National Organ Transplant Act
"[March 22, 2023] Today, the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA), an agency of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), announced a Modernization Initiative that includes several actions to strengthen accountability and transparency in the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN):
"Data dashboards detailing individual transplant center and organ procurement organization data on organ retrieval, waitlist outcomes, and transplants, and demographic data on organ donation and transplant;
"Modernization of the OPTN IT system in line with industry-leading standards, improving OPTN governance, and increasing transparency and accountability in the system to better serve the needs of patients and families;
"HRSA’s intent to issue contract solicitations for multiple awards to manage the OPTN in order to foster competition and ensure OPTN Board of Directors’ independence;
"The President’s Fiscal Year 2024 Budget proposal to more than double investment in organ procurement and transplantation with a $36 million increase over Fiscal Year 2023 for a total of $67 million; and,
"A request to Congress included in the Fiscal Year 2024 Budget to update the nearly 40-year-old National Organ Transplant Act to take actions such as:
"Removing the appropriations cap on the OPTN contract(s) to allow HRSA to better allocate resources and,
"Expanding the pool of eligible contract entities to enhance performance and innovation through increased competition.
“Every day, patients and families across the United States rely on the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network to save the lives of their loved ones who experience organ failure,” said Carole Johnson, HRSA Administrator. “At HRSA, our stewardship and oversight of this vital work is a top priority. That is why we are taking action to both bring greater transparency to the system and to reform and modernize the OPTN. The individuals and families that depend on this life-saving work deserve no less.”
"Today, HRSA is posting on its web site at Organ Donation and Transplantation (hrsa.gov) a new data dashboard to share de-identified information on organ donors, organ procurement, transplant waitlists, and transplant recipients. Patients, families, clinicians, researchers, and others can use this data to inform decision-making as well as process improvements. Today’s launch is an initial data set, which HRSA intends to refine over time and update regularly.
"This announcement also includes a plan to strengthen accountability, equity, and performance in the organ donation and transplantation system. This iterative plan will specifically focus on five key areas: technology; data transparency; governance; operations; and quality improvement and innovation. In implementing this plan, HRSA intends to issue contract solicitations for multiple awards to manage and improve the OPTN. HRSA also intends to further the OPTN Board of Directors’ independence through the contracting process and the use of multiple contracts. Ensuring robust competition in every industry is a key priority of the Biden-Harris Administration and will help meet the OPTN Modernization Initiative’s goals of promoting innovation and the best quality of service for patients.
"Finally, the President’s Budget for Fiscal Year 2024 would more than double HRSA’s budget for organ-related work, including OPTN contracting and the implementation of the modernization initiative, to total $67 million. In addition, the Budget requests statutory changes to the National Organ Transplant Act to remove the decades old ceiling on the amount of appropriated funding that can be awarded to the statutorily required vendor(s) for the OPTN. It also requests that Congress expand the pool of eligible contract entities to enhance performance and innovation through increased competition, particularly with respect to information technology vendors.
"HRSA recognizes that while modernization work is complex, the integrity of the organ matching process is paramount and cannot be disrupted. That is why HRSA’s work will be guided by and centered around several key priorities, including the urgent needs of the more than 100,000 individuals and their families awaiting transplant; the 24/7 life-saving nature of the system; and patient safety and health. HRSA intends to engage with a wide and diverse group of stakeholders early and often to ensure a human-centered design approach that reflects pressing areas of need and ensuring experiences by system users like patients are addressed first. As a part of this commitment, HRSA has created an OPTN Modernization Website at OPTN Modernization (hrsa.gov) to keep stakeholders informed about the Modernization Initiative and provide regular progress updates."
************
Here's a related story in the NY Times:
U.S. Organ Transplant System, Troubled by Long Wait Times, Faces an Overhaul. The Biden administration announced a plan to modernize how patients are matched to organs, seeking to shorten wait times, address racial inequities and reduce deaths. By Sheryl Gay Stolberg
"The Biden administration announced on Wednesday that it would seek to break up the network that has long run the nation’s organ transplant system, as part of a broader modernization effort intended to shorten wait times, address racial inequities and reduce the number of patients who die while waiting.
*****************
Earlier, the Washington Post had a story about how the most recent (current) version of the system for allocating deceased donors is indeed having some problems, the most serious of which (in my view) is the congestion involved in placing an organ for transplant. (This congestion involves time in getting an organ accepted, and then transported...)
New liver transplant rules yield winners, losers as wasted organs reach record high. The number of lifesaving liver transplants has plummeted in some Southern and Midwestern states that struggle with higher death rates from liver disease By Malena Carollo and Ben Tanen
"New rules requiring donated livers to be offered for transplant hundreds of miles away have benefited patients in New York, California and more than a dozen other states at the expense of patients in mostly poorer states with higher death rates from liver disease, a data analysis by The Washington Post and the Markup has found.
"The shift was implemented in 2020 to prioritize the sickest patients on waitlists no matter where they live. While it has succeeded in that goal, it also has borne out the fears of critics who warned the change would reduce the number of surgeries and increase deaths in areas that already lagged behind the nation overall in health-care access.
...
"The new system, called the “acuity circles” policy, has nearly doubled the median distance livers are transported, increased transport costs and coincided with the highest number of wasted livers in nearly a decade, 949 in 2021. That’s 1 in 10 donated livers. The analysis further shows a significant increase in the number of states sending donated livers beyond their own borders. In 2019, before the new policy took effect, 21 states and territories exported a majority of livers they collected. Two years later, 42 did."
Wednesday, March 22, 2023
IgNobel Prize celebration today: laugh and think
I'll be joining an IgNoble event this afternoon at Stanford, everyone is invited.
Health Data Science Center, Wednesday, March 22, 2023, 1:00pm - 3:00pm PDT
Stanford University Rotunda E241 (Chem-H + Wu Tsai Building)
This event is open to the general public
"Our esteemed founder of the prize (and the journal the Annals of Improbable Research), Marc Abrahams, will take us through the fascinating history of the Ig Nobel Prize, from its inception in 1991 to the present day. We will learn about the inspiration behind the award, the selection process, and his most unforgettable moments along the way.
"We will be joined by Professor Alvin Roth (Nobel Economics Prize 2012) who will share his insights in research and active blogging, as well as Dr. Genie Scott (Public Welfare Medal 2010) on her journey with Ig Nobel and improbable research.
"We will hear from some of the brightest minds in research today as our panelists engage in discussions about the significance of improbable research. Our panelists include Alvin Roth (Economics) and Genie C. Scott (Anthropology), past (Ig) Nobel Prize laureates who have made groundbreaking discoveries in fields such as physics, medicine, economics, public policies, and more.
"Audience members will also have the opportunity to ask questions and engage in the conversation with our panelists, as well as sign up for a meet-and-greet with Marc after the event.
"Join us for an unforgettable afternoon of laughs, learning, and thought-provoking discussions at the Ig Nobel Prize face-to-face Event!"
Tuesday, March 21, 2023
The future cannabis market?
The Washington Post has the story on a big bet on the future of the American cannabis market:
Giant California greenhouse signals a big bet on cannabis legalization. One enormous facility on the northern edge of metro Los Angeles reveals expectations of marijuana becoming legal nationally. By Scott Wilson
"Graham Farrar has placed the bet here. He is the president and co-founder of Glass House Farms, and the company’s greenhouse offers 5 million square feet of indoor space for cannabis production. That comes to just over 114 acres, the equivalent of about 86 football fields.
...
"Far from the misty northern redoubts of the state’s historic cannabis culture, the crop here grows just a few miles from highway-side outlet malls, an expanding regional airport, and the broad blue-stretch and logo-smile of an Amazon warehouse and distribution center.
"Those neighborhood ambitions help reveal Farrar’s own restless intent — to create a national cannabis business, even though his product, while legal in the Republic of California, remains illegal in the United States of America.
“I have the capacity, when the time is right, to produce on a national scale the best cannabis in the world,” Farrar said during a recent tour.
“And when that happens,” Farrar added, speaking of national legalization, “this farm goes from feeling really big to really small.”
...
"Last year, the California legislature passed a bill to allow licensed California cannabis businesses to sell their products in other cannabis-legal states.
...
"In a recent interview, Lee said that allowing trade with Oregon, Washington, Nevada and Colorado — all cannabis-legal states — would pose a risk not “qualitatively” different than what the state or cannabis businesses are taking now by defying federal law.
...
"In this marketing view, California is to weed what Cuba is to cigars."
Monday, March 20, 2023
Victor Elias (1937-2023)
Victor Elias died last week, at 85. He had a strong influence on academic economics in Argentina, not least through the many influential Argentine economists he helped inspire to study in the U.S., particularly at the University of Chicago, where he got his Ph.D. in 1969.
Here's the funeral notice published yesterday in La Nacion:
Here's the obit from La Gaceta
Murió el economista tucumano Víctor Elías. Tuvo una reconocida trayectoria como académico en la UNT. Tenía 85 años.[Tucuman economist Víctor Elías died. He had a recognized career as an academic at UNT. He was 85 years old.]
"The renowned Tucuman economist and academic Víctor Elías passed away at the age of 85, leaving an enormous legacy that has marked several generations of Tucumans who studied Economics at the National University of Tucumán.
"The son of Syrian immigrants, he was born in the capital of Tucumán on July 21, 1937 and due to his ancestry he received the nickname "Turk", as he was known inside and outside academic circles. "
 |
| Victor Elias and Al Roth, Tucuman, November 2016, photo by Ivan Werning |
Sunday, March 19, 2023
Kidney exchange in Turkey: a decade of experience at a hospital in Istanbul
Here's a recent article, from Bahcesehir University Goztepe Medicalpark Hospital Transplant Center, in Istanbul which has a decade of experience in kidney exchange. It's main point is that Turkey needs more kidney exchange, organized on a larger scale, because the deceased donor system there is very limited, so transplants primarily involve living donors.
Long-Term Outcomes of Kidney Paired Donation Transplantation: A Single Center Retrospective Cohort Study, by Eda Altun and Melike Yavuz In Transplantation Proceedings. Elsevier, 2023.
"In this single-center, retrospective, cohort study, we analyzed 141 KPD transplant patients from July 2011 to June 2020 at Bahcesehir University Goztepe Medicalpark Hospital Transplant Center, Istanbul, Turkey.
...
"Although the current study is based on a single-center's records, the findings suggest that the long-term outcomes of the KPD program were similar to conventional LDKT. These results demonstrate that KPD is practicable, thriving, and successful if performed to a more extensive donor list. Efforts should be made to expand the KPD program in countries such as Turkey, where cadaveric transplantation is insufficient. "
***********
Earlier:
Friday, July 24, 2015
Saturday, March 18, 2023
Are embryos property?
A Virginia judge has managed to make a repugnant legal argument about a repugnant transaction, since the relevant precedent he identifies has to do with the ownership of slaves.
Virginia judge rules human embryos are ‘chattel’ based on centuries-old slave laws by Matthew Barakat, Associated Press
"Frozen human embryos can legally be considered property, or “chattel,” a Virginia judge has ruled, basing his decision in part on a 19th century law governing the treatment of slaves.
"The preliminary opinion by Fairfax County Circuit Court Judge Richard Gardiner – delivered in a long-running dispute between a divorced husband and wife – is being criticized by some for wrongly and unnecessarily delving into a time in Virginia history when it was legally permissible to own human beings.
“It’s repulsive and it’s morally repugnant,” said Susan Crockin, a lawyer and scholar at Georgetown University’s Kennedy Institute of Ethics and an expert in reproductive technology law.
...
"In a separate part of his opinion, Gardiner also said he erred when he initially concluded that human embryos cannot be sold.
“As there is no prohibition on the sale of human embryos, they may be valued and sold, and thus may be considered ‘goods or chattels,’” he wrote."
HT: Kim Krawiec
Friday, March 17, 2023
Talent management in the Marine Corps--lateral entry?
"Talent management" is making inroads in the armed forces. One anomaly of military service is that almost all of its personnel enter the business at around age 18: there is almost no lateral entry. But some skills, such as those related to cyber warfare, can also be cultivated in the private sector. Think how hard it would be to run a tech company if you could only recruit your people right out of high school or college.
Defense One has the story:
"Monday’s update highlights Berger’s dissatisfaction with the Corps’ progress toward what’s called “lateral entry”—enabling recruits with critical skills to come in at a rank that reflects their experience. The commandant wants the lateral-entry system to focus first on reservists and Marines who have left the service. This could help fill cyber jobs and others in which the Corps competes with the civilian sector, Glynn said.
...
The service is still working on bringing to life its Talent Management Engagement Portal, which the update calls “a must-pay bill.” It is meant to improve career assignment selections with a transparent “marketplace” for Marines, units, and assignment managers, according to Glynn."
**********
Here's the Marine Corps' report Talent Management 2030 from November 2021
"CREATING A PATH TO LATERAL ENTRY
"Our current enlisted recruiting model is optimized for ecruiting teenagers, and for officers, those in their early twenties. (It was not always this way: During theInterwar Period, potential enlisted recruits had to be over 21 and required a character reference from an employer, teacher, coach, or religious leader). While we will always seek to attract young Americans to our ranks, we do not have an effective vehicle for finding, recruiting, and onboarding talented Americans who already possess critical skills. In other words, there is currently only one way to join the Marine Corps – at the bottom.
...
"The rapid rise in importance of the cyber domain, for instance, has challenged us to find creative ways to quickly build critical skills at mid-career and senior levels. Unless we find a means to quickly infuse expertise into the force – at the right ranks – I am concerned that advances in artificial intelligence and robotics, among other fields where the speed of technological change is exponential, will force us into a reactive posture. We should have an open door for exceptionally talented Americans who wish to join the Marine Corps, allowing them to laterally enter at a rank appropriate to their education, experience, and ability."
And, somewhat separately
"CREATING A TALENT MARKETPLACE
"Taking advantage of the initial lessons learned by the Army, Navy, and Air Force, we are developing a web-based “talent marketplace,” where units post job information about available billets, Marines apply for those positions virtually, and monitors serve as overall managers and arbiters. While much in the way of mechanics remains to be determined, I am committed to creating a process that places increased responsibility in the hands of unit commanders and individual Marines, employs cutting edge technology, and preserves a vital role for headquarters. Initially, our talent marketplace will be for officers, and eventually senior enlisted, while we assess options for changes to the junior enlisted assignments process."
**************
Earlier:
Wednesday, November 10, 2021
Thursday, March 16, 2023
Deaccessioning dispute at Valparaiso
Selling donated art is controversial, but it is tempting when the budget is bare...
The NY Times has the story:
Its Georgia O’Keeffe Is Worth Millions. And Its Dorms Need Updating. In the face of declining enrollment, Valparaiso University in Indiana wants to raise money to renovate two dormitories by selling treasures from its art museum. Not everyone is on board. By Kalia Richardson, March 10, 2023
"Valparaiso, a Lutheran university in northwestern Indiana that is struggling with the declining enrollment seen at many schools, is planning to sell several works from the collection of its Brauer Museum of Art to raise $10 million for the renovation of two freshman dormitories, which it sees as key to securing its future.
"The announcement angered many arts organizations and has divided the university: Last week the faculty senate approved a nonbinding resolution that sought to halt the sale and identify alternative ways to fund the renovations.
...
"Schools typically court controversy when they announce they will sell artworks to raise funds, an act known as deaccessioning. Several sales have resulted in sanctions from art associations. To settle a lawsuit, Brandeis University, in Waltham, Mass., reversed its decision to sell off its artwork and close its museum, part of a plan it had made in 2009 during the Great Recession."
Wednesday, March 15, 2023
SITE 2023 Conference Call For Papers
There are 18 sessions at Stanford SITE this summer, something for everyone. (You can submit papers at the link.) Regular readers of this blog may be particularly interested in Session 3: Market Design; Session 4: Dynamic Games, Contracts, and Markets; Session 5: Psychology and Economics; Session 6: Experimental Economics, all described below.
SITE 2023 Conference Call For Papers
Session 1: Empirical Implementation of Theoretical Models of Strategic Interaction and Dynamic Behavior
Wednesday, July 12, 2023, 9:00am - Friday, July 14, 2023, 5:00pm
Landau Economics Building, 579 Jane Stanford Way, Stanford, CA 94305
The unifying theme of the papers for this session is a theoretical model of an economic interaction and an empirical implementation of this theoretical model using actual data. This year will have a more concentrated focus on topics where the theoretical economic model must also respect both technology and legal institutions governing the economic environment as well as the optimizing behavior and strategic behavior of economic agents. For example, in the case of wholesale electricity markets with significant amounts intermittent renewables and storage devices that can either inject or withdraw electricity, simplified economic models that do not account for the physics of power flows, non-convexities dispatchable generation units operate (such as start-up costs, limited range of output levels, and limited rates of change in their output levels), and how forward financial markets can limit the impact of these non-convexities and intermittency risks are increasingly ill-suited for policy analysis or the assessment of market design changes. Recent experience with the simplified markets for both natural gas and electricity in Australia, Europe and the United States provide ample real-world evidence of the need for economic models that incorporate these factors for effective policy analysis and market design. There is an increasing number of engineers that recognize strategic behavior by market participants that understand the physics of power systems and natural gas systems operation can create economically and environmentally harmful market outcomes.
The goal of this session is to encourage cross-field interaction between the increasing number of engineers with some knowledge of economic models of strategic behavior and economists that understand how to use data to estimate theory-based econometric models of strategic behavior in complex economic environments but do not understand how to incorporate into the empirical models the physical constraints and legal framework that are having a first-order impact on market participant behavior and market outcomes. There are many other examples where these same issues arise in modeling strategic behavior such as air travel and freight transportation where this same interaction between engineers and economist would be particularly fruitful. The session welcomes these kinds of papers from both economists and engineers as well.
ORGANIZED BY: Christoph Graf, New York University, Frank Wolak, Stanford University
DEADLINE FOR PAPER SUBMISSION April 15, 2023
Session 2: International Macroeconomics and Finance
Monday, July 31, 2023, 9:00am - Tuesday, August 1, 2023, 5:00pm
This session is on international macroeconomics and finance, focusing on global capital allocations, the role of the dollar, the emergence of China, and tax havens. Both empirics and theory.
ORGANIZED BY: Antonio Coppola, Stanford University Matteo Maggiori, Stanford University Jesse Schreger, Columbia University Chenzi Xu, Stanford University
DEADLINE FOR PAPER SUBMISSION May 1, 2023
Session 3: Market Design
August 3, 2023, 9:00am - Friday, August 4, 2023, 5:00pm
Landau Economics Building, 579 Jane Stanford Way, Stanford, CA 94305
This session seeks to bring together researchers in economics, computer science, and operations research working on market design. We’re aiming for a roughly even split between theory papers and empirical and experimental papers. In addition to faculty members, we also invite graduate students on the job market to submit their paper for shorter graduate student talks.
ORGANIZED BY: Mohammad Akbarpour, Stanford University Piotr Dworczak, Northwestern University Ravi Jagadeesan, Stanford University Shengwu Li, Harvard University Ellen Muir, Harvard University
DEADLINE FOR PAPER SUBMISSION May 1, 2023
Session 4: Dynamic Games, Contracts, and Markets
Monday, August 7, 2023, 9:00am - Wednesday, August 9, 2023, 5:00pm
This session is to bring together microeconomic theorists working on dynamic games and contracts with more applied theorists working in macro, finance, organizational economics, and other fields. There are two aims. First, this is a venue to discuss the latest questions and techniques facing researchers working in dynamic games and contracts. Second, to foster interdisciplinary discussion between scholars working on parallel topics in different disciplines and help raise awareness among theorists of the open questions in other fields.
ORGANIZED BY: Arjada Bardhi, Duke University Simon Board, University of California Los Angeles Erik Madsen, New York University Joao Ramos, University of Southern California Andrzej Skrzypacz, Stanford University Takuo Sugaya, Stanford University
DEADLINE FOR PAPER SUBMISSION April 15, 2023
Session 5: Psychology and Economics
Tuesday, August 8, 2023, 9:00am - Wednesday, August 9, 2023, 5:00pm
LOCATION: John A. and Cynthia Fry Gunn Building, 366 Galvez Street, Stanford
This session brings together researchers working on issues at the intersection of psychology and economics. The segment will focus on evidence of and explanations for non-standard choice patterns, as well as the positive and normative implications of those patterns in a wide range of economic decision-making contexts, such as lifecycle consumption and savings, workplace productivity, health, and prosocial behavior. The presentations will frequently build upon insights from other disciplines, including psychology and sociology. Theoretical, empirical, and experimental studies will be included.
ORGANIZED BY: B. Douglas Bernheim, Stanford University John Beshears, Harvard University Vincent Crawford, University of Oxford & University of California San Diego David Laibson, Harvard University Ulrike Malmendier, University of California Berkeley
DEADLINE FOR PAPER SUBMISSION May 8, 2023
Session 6: Experimental Economics
Thursday, August 10, 2023, 9:00am - Friday, August 11, 2023, 5:00pm
LOCATION: John A. and Cynthia Fry Gunn Building, 366 Galvez Street, S
This session will be dedicated to advances in experimental economics combining laboratory and field-experimental methodologies with theoretical and psychological insights on decision-making, strategic interaction and policy. We are inviting papers in lab experiments, field experiments and their combination that test theory, demonstrate the importance of psychological phenomena, and explore social and policy issues. In addition to senior faculty members, invited presenters will include junior faculty as well as graduate students.
ORGANIZED BY: Christine Exley, Harvard University Kirby Nielsen, California Institute of Technology Muriel Niederle, Stanford University Alvin Roth, Stanford University Lise Vesterlund, University of Pittsburgh
DEADLINE FOR PAPER SUBMISSION May 8, 2023
Session 7: Political Economic Theory
Thursday, August 10, 2023, 9:00am - Friday, August 11, 2023, 5:00am
LOCATION: Stanford Graduate School of Business, M104,
This session will bring together researchers from political science and economics who apply economic theory to the study of politics. This includes work in the areas of voting theory, political bargaining, policy-making and implementation, lobbying and regulation, and the media and information environment in which politics takes place. The session will encourage productive dialogue between researchers in economic theory that have developed ideas and tools relevant to the study of politics, and those in political science who study questions and topics that can be addressed by economic theory.
ORGANIZED BY: Nina Bobkova, Rice University Steven Callander, Stanford University Hülya Eraslan, Rice University Dana Foarta, Stanford University Federica Izzo, University of California San Diego
DEADLINE FOR PAPER SUBMISSION May 10, 2023
Session 8: Politically Feasible Environmental and Energy Policy
Monday, August 14, 2023, 9:00am - Tuesday, August 15, 2023, 5:00pm
LOCATION: Landau Economics Building,
This session will feature empirical papers evaluating environmental and energy (E&E) policy decisions by both governments and firms. The session will focus on papers that deliver useful and politically feasible insights on how to make E&E policy more efficient and equitable. We welcome papers studying topics such as the following:
Quantitative evaluations of past or potential future E&E policy changes,
How to improve the public appeal of economically efficient E&E policies,
Evaluations of voluntary corporate actions such as net-zero commitments and ESG investing screens, and
Empirical evaluations of utility programs, such as energy efficiency, load management, and pricing reform.
One potential downstream impact of this session could be a concrete set of politically feasible suggestions for efficient and equitable E&E policy reforms for governments and firms.
In addition to standard paper presentations, we will leave time for structured conversations to encourage new interactions and collaborations.
ORGANIZED BY: Hunt Allcott, Stanford University Meredith Fowlie, University of California Berkeley Lawrence Goulder, Stanford University Joe Shapiro, University of California Berkeley
DEADLINE FOR PAPER SUBMISSION May 15, 2023
Session 9: Climate Finance, Innovation, and Challenges for Policy
Wednesday, August 16, 2023, 9:00am - Thursday, August 17, 2023, 5:00pm
LOCATION: Landau Economics Building, 579 Jane Stanford Way, Stanford, CA 94305
The session would bring together research on how to best finance companies that innovate on green technologies, the pricing of climate risks in financial markets, banks' exposures to climate risk and their regulation, the impact of monetary policy on climate change, and policies more broadly that help mitigate climate changes.
ORGANIZED BY:
Juliane Begenau, Stanford University Stefano Giglio, Yale University Lars Peter Hansen, University of Chicago Monika Piazzesi, Stanford University
DEADLINE FOR PAPER SUBMISSION May 15, 2023
Session 10: Fiscal Sustainability
Monday, August 21, 2023, 9:00am - Tuesday, August 22, 2023, 5:00pm
As governments emerge from the pandemic, they are dealing with major challenges in regards to fiscal sustainability. We want to organize a session that focuses on topics at the intersection of monetary policy, fiscal policy and sustainability, and the valuation of government debt. What role do central banks play in creating fiscal space for governments? Is there a possibility of fiscal dominance going forward? How does this possibility affect asset prices and the creation of safe assets? Could the erosion of the U.S. fiscal position threaten its reserve currency role?
ORGANIZED BY: Francesco Bianchi, Johns Hopkins University Arvind Krishnamurthy, Stanford University Hanno Nico Lustig, Stanford University
DEADLINE FOR PAPER SUBMISSION May 22, 2023
Session 11: Financial Regulation
Monday, August 28, 2023, 9:00am - Wednesday, August 30, 2023, 12:00pm
LOCATION: Landau Economics Building, 579 Jane Stanford Way, Stanford, CA 94305
This session discusses the latest advances in theoretical and empirical issues related to financial regulation, defined broadly. Topics will include, but will not be limited to, connections of regulation for intermediaries, households and policymakers in the US and outside the US.
ORGANIZED BY: Gregor Matvos, Northwestern University Amit Seru, Stanford University
DEADLINE FOR PAPER SUBMISSION May 29, 2023
Session 12: IO of Healthcare and Credit Markets
Wednesday, August 30, 2023, 1:00pm - Thursday, August 31, 2023, 5:00pm
LOCATION: Landau Economics Building, 579 Jane Stanford Way, Stanford, CA 94305
This session will bring together researchers working on the IO of healthcare and credit markets. These markets share similar features, including selection, market power, behavioral consumers, among others. We believe there are opportunities for fruitful interaction between researchers studying these environments.
ORGANIZED BY: Jose Ignacio Cuesta, Stanford University Liran Einav, Stanford University Gaston Illanes, Northwestern University Pietro Tebaldi, Columbia University
DEADLINE FOR PAPER SUBMISSION May 22, 2023
Session 13: The Macroeconomics of Uncertainty and Volatility
Wednesday, September 6, 2023, 9:00am - Friday, September 8, 2023, 5:00pm
LOCATION: John A. and Cynthia Fry Gunn Building, 366 Galvez Street
The session will cover recent work on the causes and effects of changes in volatility and uncertainty. This can cover everything from the COVID pandemic, Monetary, Fiscal shocks to Wars, and Regulatory changes. This session will focus on measuring changes in uncertainty, evaluating its mechanisms and impacts on firms, consumers, national or global economies, discussing policy responses and any other related topics. The mix of academics and policy makers across multiple institutions reflects this broad interest. Papers or presentation slides are required (abstracts only will not be accepted).
ORGANIZED BY: Nicholas Bloom, Stanford University Steven Davis, University of Chicago Jesus Fernandez-Villaverde, University of Pennsylvania Zheng Liu, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco Bo Sun, University of Virginia Nancy R. Xu, Boston College
DEADLINE FOR PAPER SUBMISSION June 5, 2023
Session 14: New Frontiers in Asset Pricing
Wednesday, September 6, 2023, 9:00am - Friday, September 8, 2023, 5:00pm
This session is for asset pricing papers on the frontier of the discipline. Particular areas of focus are macrofinance, computation, machine learning, and climate finance. Possible topics include but are not limited to the following: asset pricing, investor heterogeneity, learning and ambiguity, new preference structures for pricing models, or using machine learning to understand the cross-section of returns. A particular area of interest is climate finance, where both climate change and the policy responses to climate change present new risks in asset pricing markets. Topics of interest include asset pricing with heterogeneous agents and disaster risks, credit risk modeling for possibly stranded assets, the implications of integrated assessment models for financial risks, and methodological advances in solution methods for complex analyses of climate finance models. As the analysis of such models often requires the use of computational methods, we encourage submissions that develop and make use of new numerical techniques.
ORGANIZED BY: Kenneth Judd, Hoover Institution at Stanford University Walter Pohl, Norwegian School of Economics Karl Schmedders, IMD Lausanne Ole Wilms, University of Hamburg & Tilburg University
DEADLINE FOR PAPER SUBMISSION June 5, 2023
Session 15: The Micro and Macro of Labor Markets
Thursday, September 7, 2023, 9:00am - Friday, September 8, 2023, 5:00pm
LOCATION: Landau Economics Building, 579 Jane Stanford Way, Stanford, CA 94305
The idea of this session is to bring together labor economists and macroeconomists with interests in labor markets with two goals. The first goal is to be a venue to discuss the latest research about labor markets. The second goal is to promote intellectual exchange among scholars working on similar topics, but with different approaches. Specific topics will depend on the submissions.
ORGANIZED BY: Gregor Jarosch, Duke University Isaac Sorkin, Stanford University
DEADLINE FOR PAPER SUBMISSION May 15, 2023
Session 16: Frontiers of Macroeconomic Research
Monday, September 11, 2023, 9:00am - Wednesday, September 13, 2023, 5:00pm
LOCATION: Landau Economics Building, 579 Jane Stanford Way, Stanford, CA 94305
The goal of the session is to bring together researchers working in macroeconomics, broadly defined. The session will focus on both short-run macroeconomic fluctuations, as well as open questions in economic growth. We welcome submissions that are quantitative, theoretical or empirical in nature. We hope that the diverse research topics within macroeconomics covered in the session will foster engaging and productive discussion.
ORGANIZED BY: Adrien Auclert, Stanford University Luigi Bocola, Stanford University Kurt Mitman, Stockholm University
DEADLINE FOR PAPER SUBMISSION June 12, 2023
Session 17: Labor Markets and Policies
Thursday, September 14, 2023, 9:00am - Saturday, September 16, 2023, 5:00pm
This session offers a forum for scholars interested in the use of general equilibrium models disciplined by micro data to carefully analyze important labor market issues and reforms to address them. The use of these models to conduct comprehensive quantitative analyses of policy reforms is still in its infancy. The goal of this session is to bring together a diverse group of scholars, both young and established, engaged in frontier research in this area. The session is organized around three themes, all of which have implications for the observed increase in wage and wealth inequality in the United States. The first theme is about the dynamic effects of increases in the minimum wage and of the taxation of wealth of the types now being discussed and implemented in the United States, in both the short and the long run. The second theme is about how the growth and diffusion of automation will lead to changes in the structure of wages, work, and employment in developed industrial economies. The third theme is about the effect on labor markets of the adoption of trade reforms that differentially expose some sectors of an economy to much more intense international competition.
ORGANIZED BY: Erik Hurst, University of Chicago Patrick Kehoe, Stanford University Elena Pastorino, Stanford University
DEADLINE FOR PAPER SUBMISSION June 30, 2023
Session 18: Gender
Friday, September 15, 2023, 9:00am - Saturday, September 16, 2023, 5:00pm
LOCATION: Landau Economics Building, 579 Jane Stanford Way, Stanford, CA 94305
This session will be dedicated to understanding how gender influences economic outcomes and decision-making. We invite submissions of papers whose main focus is on gender, regardless of field, to foster dialogue across fields. In addition to senior faculty members, invited presenters will include junior faculty as well as graduate students.
ORGANIZED BY:
Alejandro Martinez-Marquina, University of Southern California Muriel Niederle, Stanford University Alessandra Voena, Stanford University
DEADLINE FOR PAPER SUBMISSION June 16, 2023
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
