Wednesday, November 11, 2026

Human organ trafficking and missing persons in China, PNAS

 Here's a study, recently published in PNAS, that tries to very indirectly infer the rate of illegal organ trafficking in China.  It's sure to be controversial.

X. Wang, Human organ trafficking and missing persons in China, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 123 (44) e2608464123, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2608464123 (2026). 

 "Abstract
The persistent shortage of human organs for transplantation has long been a global challenge. The prospect of substantial profit creates strong incentives for illegal organ trafficking, including murder for organ harvesting, yet empirical evidence remains scarce. This study addresses this gap by exploiting a unique quasi-natural experiment created by China’s organ policy reform. From 1984 to 2014, executed prisoners were the primary source of transplant organs in China. In 2015, the Chinese government abolished the use of organs from executed prisoners, sharply exacerbating the organ shortage. Following this policy change, the number of missing persons rose notably nationwide. Employing difference-in-differences and triple-difference strategies, we show that, compared to cases unrelated to organ trafficking (e.g., voluntary disappearances), the number and incidence of involuntary missing persons plausibly related to organ trafficking increased significantly after 2015. The effects are especially pronounced among individuals with mental illness and in regions with higher transplant demand and greater transplant capacity. Although we do not directly observe organ trafficking, the spatial, temporal, and demographic patterns we document are consistent with the hypothesis that increased organ scarcity intensified incentives for illicit organ procurement. More broadly, the findings suggest that severe organ shortages may generate unintended and highly harmful consequences, even in a low-crime setting such as China. These results underscore the importance of accounting for behavioral responses and illicit-market incentives when designing policies that restrict the supply of scarce, high-value goods such as transplant organs."

 

Tuesday, November 10, 2026

Call for papers: 21st Matching in Practice Workshop, Budapest, December 14-15

 Here's a call for papers for the  21st Matching in Practice Workshop in Budapest in December.

21st Matching in Practice Workshop
December 14 @ 9:00 am - December 15 @ 3:00 pm
"The MiP Workshop is an annual meeting organized by the Matching in Practice network of European researchers working in the research field of Matching Theory and Market Design.

The event has no registration fee, but invitation is needed for attendance. Catering and dinner will be provided to all participants, but the travel and accommodation costs are only covered for the plenary speaker. The host organisation is the Institute of Operations and Decision Sciences, Corvinus University of Budapest.

The plenary talk will be given by Irene Lo (Stanford), and the roundtable discussion will be on school choice.

We call for submissions for 12 selected contributed talks. The deadline for submitting the papers is 12 November, sent in pdf format to peter.biro@uni-corvinus.hu (title: “MiP workshop submission”), decisions will be made on 13 November by the scientific committee. We especially welcome submissions on school choice or other two-sided matching market applications."

Monday, November 9, 2026

School choice in San Francisco: plans and politics happen at different speeds

 A report  in PNAS last week on a long-running study of school choice proposals in San Francisco came out almost simultaneously with an announcement that San Francisco Unified School District (SFUSD) plans to largely step back from school choice and revert to a system of neighborhood schools determined by students' home addresses. Below are the PNAS paper, the SFUSD announcements, and then some links to the history of school choice in SF.

I. Lo, K. Mentzer, M. YahyazadehJeloudar, H. O’Connell, J. Monardo, & I. Ashlagi, Designing school choice for diversity in the San Francisco Unified School District, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 123 (45). November 2, 2026, e2524796123, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2524796123 (2026). 

 "Abstract.  More than 65 years after the Brown v. Board of Education ruling that school segregation is unconstitutional, public schools across the United States are again experiencing rising segregation. In districts like San Francisco, efforts to implement district-wide choice policies have largely failed to reverse these trends. Since 2019, we have collaborated with the San Francisco Unified School District to design a student assignment policy meeting the district’s goals of diversity, predictability, and proximity. We use optimization techniques to develop policies restricting choice to zones. We compare these to district-wide choice policies by estimating a choice model using historical application data and simulating assignment. Our results show multiple policies can reduce school segregation while preserving varying degrees of proximity, choice, and predictability. Zone-based policies with reserves reduce the concentration of racial minority students in high-poverty schools and maintain proximity, but reduce choice. District-wide choice with reserves and distance-based priority can further reduce segregation, but at the cost of predictability. Tradeoffs are necessary as no policy dominates another policy. In addition, we show that spatial segregation indices capture average patterns in these tradeoffs but miss important variation revealed by our simulation framework. Our work informed the design and approval of a zone-based policy in San Francisco in 2020, and supports ongoing policy implementation."

 

##########

Oct. 20, 2026 Message from SFUSD Superintendent Dr. Maria Su to Families: Link to this section

Historic Step Toward a Great Neighborhood School for Every Student 

Oct. 13, 2026 Press Release:  Link to this section

San Francisco Board of Education Approves Resolution to Move SFUSD Toward Neighborhood-Based Student Assignment System


Introduction:  Link to this section

SFUSD is changing how students are assigned to elementary schools. On October 13, 2026, the Board of Education voted to replace the current lottery with a neighborhood-based system. Under the proposed policy, every family would be guaranteed a seat at a school near home, no matter when they apply. Families could still apply to citywide programs, such as language programs and K-8 schools. We are making this change because families have told us the current process feels complicated and unpredictable. Where your child goes to school should not come down to luck.

The Board’s vote sets a direction. It is not the final policy. Over the next few months, we will meet with families in their schools and neighborhoods, in many languages, to work out the details. The Board will hold its final vote on April 13, 2027. Nothing changes for current families. The new system will start with students who enroll in the 2028-29 school year.

A new assignment system is only part of the work. Every child deserves a strong school close to home, so we also plan to invest in schools in every neighborhood, starting with those that have been the most underserved.

###########

San Francisco has been considering and tinkering with school choice for a long time, during a period in which other kinds of political turmoil rocked SF and its schools.  Here (mostly from 2010) and here are some of my earlier posts on school choice in SF. 

Friday, November 6, 2026

The Milken Institute Review on blood and plasma, and altruism (with art work)

 You can  be paid to donate blood plasma, and still be an altruist.

Issue four, 2026 of the Milken Institute Review, excerpts the chapter on blood supply from my book Moral Economics. 

The last quoted line of the  chapter is  "Health care that's good enough for the rich shouldn't be repugnant for the poor."

Peter Passell, the long-time editor of the review, writes

"Nobel Prize winners in the sciences can justifiably lay claim to mind-bending insights and stunning discoveries that change our lives. Readers may be excused, though, for wondering whether the same can be said about the achievements honored by the Nobel in economic science, which generally excite only the nerds among us. ¶ Not so for the work of Alvin Roth, a Stanford University economist whose deep dives into how markets function earned him a trip to Stockholm in 2012. He pioneered changes in what are called “matching markets” – work that has revolutionized the process for matching kidney donors and recipients. ¶ In his new book Moral Economics: From Prostitution to Organ Sales, What Controversial Transactions Reveal About How Markets Work,* Roth dissects markets in which the legitimacy of voluntary transactions is widely disputed. Here, we excerpt the chapter on the market for human blood, where millions of patients’ lives depend on sources of blood that cannot legally be purchased. It’s a tale that’s going to surprise you.

— Peter Passell, Published October 30, 2026 "

*Copyright © 2026 by Alvin E. Roth. Reprinted by permission of Basic Venture, an imprint of Basic Books Group, a division of Hachette Book Group, Inc., New York, NY. All rights reserved. 

#########

It turns out that Peter excerpts my books as fast as I can write them:)

Tuesday, October 27, 2015 Chapter 4 of Who Gets What and Why, in the Milken Institute Review (with art work...) 

https://www.milkenreview.org/articles/who-gets-what-and-why 

 

Thursday, November 5, 2026

William Nordhaus (1941-2026) and Jim Andreoni (1959-2026)

 I returned from a long trip and an arduous conference last week to learn that two important economists had passed away, Bill Nordhaus, who won a Nobel, and Jim Andreoni, who could have.

Nordhaus' work on climate change was prescient, and is well known.  Here's the Nordhaus obit from Yale:

William Nordhaus, Nobel laureate who integrated economics and climate change, devoted Yale citizen  Oct 31, 2026  By Penelope Laurans  

"William Nordhaus ‘63, Sterling Professor of Economics who won a Nobel Prize in 2018 for integrating climate change into long-run macroeconomic analysis, died Oct. 30 at age 85. 

##########

Jim Andreoni was a multi-talented scholar of public goods, well known in the experimental economics community.  The work that in my mind made him a Nobel candidate was his work on different forms that altruism can take.

Two of his papers that I really like are 

Andreoni, James. "Impure altruism and donations to public goods: A theory of warm-glow giving." The economic journal 100, no. 401 (1990): 464-477.

and

James Andreoni, Justin M. Rao, and Hannah Trachtman, Avoiding the Ask: A Field Experiment on Altruism, Empathy, and Charitable Giving. Journal of Political Economy 2017 125:625-653.  

The first of those, a theory paper, I think of as one of the foundational papers about effective altruism, but from the point of view that much altruism is not primarily of the effective sort.

The second paper is an experiment that I'll present to my class today, in Jim's memory. 

 

 #############

 Vigorous, personal disagreement about what constitutes altruism in organ donation and transplantation was what made my Geneva conference so arduous (and what makes the kinds of controversial markets I discuss in Moral Economics so controversial:).

Monday, October 26, 2026 Brocher conference on boundaries for incentives in organ donation Oct 27-29 in Geneva

(No description of the conference has been posted yet, but it was hot and heavy, and everyone was an altruist...) 

  


Tuesday, November 3, 2026

happy post-Halloween

In our garden:



Saturday, October 31, 2026

Sports, ethnicity, and the urban geography of basketball

 I'm just back from an unexpectedly grueling trip, and hope to resume semi-daily blogging.  This story caught my eye: basketball has been an inner city game in the U.S., in part because basketball courts can be set up very inexpensively in urban parks, and not so expensively in gyms.  So inner city kids are disproportionately represented among the most talented players.  But who those kids are has changed over time.

The WSJ has the story: 

When Jews Ruled the Basketball Court.  Six players on the New York Knicks’ inaugural roster were Jewish.  By Michael Freund 

 "It was Nov. 1, 1946, and Ossie Schectman of the New York Knicks took a bounce pass and scored on a two-handed underhand layup. Schectman, the son of Russian Jewish immigrants, had just scored the first basket in NBA history.

...

"Six members of the Knicks’ original roster, including Schectman, were Jewish. That was no coincidence. For much of the early 20th century, basketball was widely regarded as a Jewish game.

"The reason can be traced to the immigrant neighborhoods of New York and Philadelphia. Millions of Jews arrived from Eastern Europe beginning in the 1880s, often settling in neighborhoods with little open space and scant money to spend on recreation. Baseball required a field and equipment. Basketball needed little more than a ball, a hoop and a schoolyard. "

Monday, October 26, 2026

Brocher conference on boundaries for incentives in organ donation Oct 27-29 in Geneva

 I'm on my way to the Brocher Foundation, near Geneva, for a conference organized by Swisstransplant (SWT) and the Declaration of Istanbul Custodian Group (DICG), on

 Constructive dialogue interrogating boundaries for incentives in organ donation  

"The shortage of organs available for transplantation poses a major challenge to healthcare systems. Some proposals aim to introduce incentives to encourage organ donation. This workshop examines the ethical implications of these strategies and discusses acceptable limits for promoting donation while respecting human dignity." 

Sunday, October 25, 2026

Economics competition for high school and middle school students in Italy

Yesterday,  Tito Boeri, David Card and I attended the  award ceremony of the EconoMia and EcoQuiz competitions for high school and middle school students in Italy.

 At the Intesa Sanpaolo skyscraper, the award ceremony of the EconoMia and EcoQuiz competitions, as part of the International Festival of Economics. 

Here we are with the high school students whose essays received awards. 

 

 

Saturday, October 24, 2026

WHO GETS TO CHOOSE? LIFE, FREEDOM, AND MORAL BOUNDARIES, a discussion with Marco Cappato, today at Collegio Carlo Alberto

I'm excited that I will get to discuss Moral Economics and controversial markets today with Marco Cappato, who has played such a large role in dealing with controversies involving medical aid in dying and reproductive rights.

CHI DECIDE? VITA, LIBERTÀ E CONFINI MORALI

WHO GETS TO CHOOSE? LIFE, FREEDOM, AND MORAL BOUNDARIES

sabato 24 ottobre
17:00 - 18:00
Centro Città
Collegio Carlo Alberto | Auditorium
Piazza Vincenzo Arbarello, 8, Torino

With

MARCO CAPPATO, ALVIN ROTH

Moderates

CATERINA SOFFICI

Live translation available

Quando le scelte riguardano il corpo, la vita e la morte, dove finisce la libertà individuale e dove deve iniziare la regolazione pubblica? Cosa dovrebbero fare le società quando le convinzioni morali divergono profondamente? Come possono le istituzioni proteggere la libertà di scelta senza lasciare indifesi i più vulnerabili?

 
When choices involve the body, life, and death, where should individual freedom end and public regulation begin? What should societies do when moral convictions sharply diverge? How can institutions protect freedom of choice without leaving the most vulnerable unprotected? 

Friday, October 23, 2026

"I'm more worried about democracy than artificial intelligence": Italian press on Moral Economics in advance of the International Festival of Economics

In the run-up to the  International Festival of Economics in Turin starting today, Vanity Fair in Italy publishes an interview with me under this headline:

Alvin Roth: «Sono più preoccupato per la democrazia che per l’intelligenza artificiale»

 "I'm more worried about democracy than artificial intelligence" 

 

The Festival itself publishes this article:

ROTH E LA SFIDA DEI MERCATI RIPUGNANTI  ROTH AND THE CHALLENGE OF REPULSIVE MARKETS 

 

And here's an essay I sent in English, translated into Italian, which you can translate back pretty well:)

Eco­no­mia in cerca di morale
Esi­stono mer­cati con­tro­versi (alcol, gioco d’azzardo, utero in affitto...) su cui i vari Paesi hanno posi­zioni diverse, riflette il Nobel Alvin E. Roth: non sem­pre si arri­verà al con­senso col­let­tivo, ma è lecito esplo­rare com­pro­messi La Lettura
Di ALVIN E. ROTH (tra­du­zione di Rita Bal­das­sarre)

Economy in search of morale
There are controversial markets (alcohol, gambling, surrogacy...) on which the various countries have different positions, reflects the Nobel Prize winner Alvin E. Roth: collective consensus will not always be reached, but it is legitimate to explore compromises 

Thursday, October 22, 2026

Market design and water conservation in the the Great Salt Lake

Silvia Console Battilana, who co-founded Auctionomics along with Paul Milgrom, writes in Forbes about the prospects for market design efforts to help conserve Utah's Great Salt Lake. 

How Market Design Could Help Save Utah’s Great Salt Lake by 
By Silvia Console Battilana

 "the Great Salt Lake is drying up.

"To save the lake while protecting water users, business leaders can adopt a little-known but powerful economic tool: market design. When water levels drop, the consequences immediately hit commercial supply chains and local commerce. Market-based incentives give businesses a way to reward upstream water conservation, bringing more water to the lake without hurting regional growth. The invisible hand of the market could identify the least expensive conservation, compensate participating water users and restore the Great Salt Lake.

...

"The shrinking of the Great Salt Lake has many causes, and there is no silver-bullet fix. But any solution to refill the lake will likely involve conservation within Utah. Seventy-one percent of the water diverted from the lake’s basin is allocated to agriculture. If those commercial users could make more efficient use of water, more would reach the lake.

The catch is that many conservation practices, like water-friendly infrastructure and precision irrigation, are expensive. Under Utah’s traditional “use-it-or-lose-it” water rights system, users have little financial reason to conserve. Without modern economic incentives, asking businesses and farms to voluntarily cut back simply isn’t realistic.

Even if water users could be forced to cut back, it’s not clear who should cut back, or by how much. The costs of water conservation aren’t the same across users, and they can be very hard to estimate.

Market design can address both of these challenges. Crucially, markets don’t force particular actions or behaviors. Instead, well-designed markets create an incentive for farms and communities to cut back on water and be rewarded for their efforts. Anyone who can cost-effectively reduce consumption will do so, while others aren’t compelled to conserve if it would be too expensive.

Market Design Works
Even when the stakes are high and a lot stands in the way, intentionally designed markets can successfully align self-interest with the public good.

Further, market design can be used to align incentives even when money isn’t exchanged: it has been used for organ donation exchanges and food banks. Harnessing the invisible hand of the market to align incentives in pursuit of a common goal is an effective tool for difficult problems."



 

 

Wednesday, October 21, 2026

The International Festival of Economics, in Turin, October 22-25

 The International Festival of Economics will take place in Turin from 22 to 25 October 2026.  I hope to be there to participate in all but the first day. (I'll be speaking on Saturday.)

 The International Festival of Economics 2026

"Following the success of its first four editions, respectively dedicated to The New Generations of the World (2025), Who Owns Knowledge (2024), Rethinking Globalization (2023), and Merit, Diversity and Social Justice (2022), the Festival will return from October 22 to 25 in some of the most beautiful venues in the center of the Piedmontese capital with a new edition titled Saving the Welfare State. In Turin, some of the most authoritative economists and international experts working at the forefront of research on this topic will meet, together with scholars from many other disciplines.

The International Festival of Economics is curated by Editori Laterza and Collegio Carlo Alberto - Torino Local Committee (TOLC) under the scientific direction of Tito Boeri. The event is promoted by the TOLC, which brings together the Piedmont Region, the City of Turin, Fondazione Compagnia di San Paolo, Fondazione CRT, the University of Turin, the Polytechnic University of Turin, the Turin Chamber of Commerce, Unioncamere Piemonte, Unione Industriali Torino, and Legacoop, coordinated by the Fondazione Collegio Carlo Alberto.

Collegio Carlo Alberto will be one of the festival's venues, hosting 29 events.

Visit the Festival Website"
 

Monday, October 19, 2026

Moral Economics reviewed in American Journal of Transplantation

 I wonder if this is the first time an economics book has been reviewed in the American Journal of Transplantation.

Poetic justice: A review of moral economics by Alvin E. Roth
Michael A. Rees

 "Alvin E. Roth describes poetic justice as the Virginia state flag flying at half-mast in 2020 in honor of Bernie Cohen, who argued the US Supreme Court case Loving v. Virginia that made interracial marriage legal. Turns out Mildred and Richard Loving were convicted of interracial marriage in 1967, arrested by police at 2 AM at home in their bed, and sentenced to 1 year in prison but suspended on the condition that they leave Virginia for 25 years. Reading what the Virginia Court of Appeals judge wrote, side by side with what the US Supreme Court wrote, is, by itself, worth the price of the book.
 

"Those of us in the field of transplantation have felt—and will continue to feel—the impact of repugnance. In moral economics, Alvin E. Roth takes us on a grand tour of how repugnance shapes transactions across a wide spectrum of human activities. Take uterus transplantation, pioneered in Sweden, a country where repugnance to surrogacy has made it illegal. You can transplant a uterus into a woman with infertility in Sweden, but do not you dare use a surrogate’s uterus in her own body to help you achieve a baby! Alvin E. Roth defines repugnance as a morally contested market that some people would like to participate in, but others think should be outlawed. He goes on to call a transaction repugnant if “all parties to the transaction want to engage in it, and others think they shouldn’t be allowed to for moral or religious reasons, even though those others can’t detect that the transaction has taken place unless someone tells them.”1 I found it fascinating to walk through all the ways in which repugnance has shaped the world in which we live.
 

"The book starts with a clear example of a transaction that many people want to engage in: sex. Of course, I knew about the repugnance surrounding prostitution and pornography, but could hardly believe the stories of how far people go on either side of a repugnant transaction. I found my own views challenged by what I thought was right, especially when considering the outcome I desired from the controversy being described. It was interesting to have these stories told by the “Father of Market Design” and to think about sexual desire as a contested marketplace with good and bad outcomes that could be influenced by better market design.
 

"It is not the first time I have been surprised to think about a human desire for something like love or health as a transaction that economists could study. I first met Alvin E. Roth in about 2004 when he thought he could help us transplant professionals do a better job with kidney exchange. I made the mistake of thinking that economists only worried about money, albeit at both the microlevel and macrolevel. This book makes clear that if we want to have the desired outcome of helping as many people as possible through organ transplantation, we are going to have to think like market designers and overcome repugnance to innovation. Remember Richard Lower in 1968 being threatened with criminal charges for “wrongful death” for removing a donor heart prior to the establishment of brain death criteria?
 

"My favorite chapter was about reproduction. You would not believe all the interesting twists and turns that have happened as artificial reproductive technology has blossomed, and some people wanted to have babies using it, whereas others were morally aghast at their desire, working hard to stop them. It was interesting to see different sides of contraception, abortion, in vitro fertilization, egg and sperm donation, paternity, maternity, parenthood, and surrogacy. But Alvin E. Roth has such a nice way of distilling complicated concepts, such as this quote: “Some critics have said that looking for an egg donor who attends Harvard, for example, reeks of eugenics. In response to that, Professor Kim Krawiec, perhaps the leading legal scholar of “taboo trades,” gave a very cogent response: “Fertile people have been screening for beauty and intelligence for years and years. It’s called dating.”2
 

"If transplantation attracted you as a field in part because of the ethical challenges encountered when considering organ donors and recipients, Moral Economics provides a narrated guide through thorny issues. Near the end of the book, we find perhaps the best call to action for those of us who want to solve problems. The Persian poet Rumi invites us to navigate repugnance: “Out beyond ideas of wrongdoing and rightdoing, there is a field. I’ll meet you there.”3
 
1. Roth, A.E.
Moral Economics: From Prostitution to Organ Sales, What Controversial Transactions Reveal About How Markets Work. Hachette UK; 2026
2026

2. Jones, A. Putting a Price on a Human Egg.”
Wall Street Journal. July 26, 2015;
Accessed XXX www.wsj.com/articles/putting-a-price-on-a-human-egg-1437952456


3.Rumi, “Out Beyond Ideas of Wrongdoing and Rightdoing.” Poetry Society of America. 

Kidney exchange may (re)emerge in Korea

 Kidney exchange, which was pioneered in South Korea in the late 1990's, has largely been moribund there.  But here's a call to change that.

Reemerging kidney paired donation in Korea: simultaneous two-way swaps to overcome human leukocyte antigen and anatomic barriers
Eunjeong Kang1,2, Kyung Ok Min1, Hee Gyung Kang3, Yohan Ahn3, Eun Young Song4, Ara Cho5, Ahram Han5, Sangil Min5, Jongwon Ha5,6,7, Sehoon Park2, Yong Chul Kim2, Yon Su Kim2,8, Hajeong Lee2,8  Kidney Research and Clinical Practice 2026;j.krcp.25.391. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23876/j.krcp.25.391
 
Abstract
Background
South Korea first implemented kidney paired donation (KPD) to overcome ABO-incompatible living-donor kidney transplantation. Although utilization declined as desensitization matured, persistent desensitization failure and anatomic constraints have renewed interest in KPD within a regulated framework. We report a recent single-center experience.
Methods
KPD exchanges were coordinated within an institutional registry under national supervision. We retrospectively reviewed six consecutive, simultaneous two-way exchanges (12 recipients) from 2022 to 2025. We assessed predefined desensitization failure or anticipated failure with the intended donor, compared immunologic compatibility between intended and exchange donors, and recorded perioperative desensitization, graft function, delayed graft function (DGF), and biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR).
Results
Five of six exchanges were undertaken for immunologic reasons. All five met criteria for desensitization failure or anticipated failure to the intended donor, with positive crossmatch and high donor-specific antibody (DSA) burden. Reassignment to the exchange donor reduced risk, lowering maximum DSA mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) from 13,228 to 1,350 and total DSA MFI from 20,542 to 2,240, although selective desensitization was still required in some recipients with residual human leukocyte antigen or ABO incompatibility. The remaining exchange addressed an anatomic constraint (adult–pediatric size mismatch). At a median follow-up of 12.2 months (range, 0.9–42.1 months), no DGF or BPAR occurred; all grafts were functioning, and the median estimated glomerular filtration rate was 66.8 mL/min/1.73 m2.
Conclusion
KPD is a safe alternative when desensitization fails or is predicted to fail, including in highly sensitized and anatomically complex candidates. These findings support renewed implementation of KPD alongside selective desensitization in Korea. 

 

Sunday, October 18, 2026

Celebrating science and democracy at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, on Monday

 If the skies remain open, I'm on my way to Jerusalem, to participate in a twice-recheduled event at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem.  (It was first scheduled for June 2025, to coincide with HUJI's 100th anniversary, but it was postponed to June 2026 on account of war with Iran.  The June 2026 event was again postponed, for the same reason...)

Now, a week before Israeli elections (and less than a month before American midterm elections), amidst all the political polarization in both countries, I'm reminded that universities are one of the bastions of democracy. I don't doubt that most of the other honorees gathering in Jerusalem feel the same way. (I note that three of the honorary doctorate recipients have received the Nobel memorial prize in economics.) 

 Honorary Doctorate Recipients:
Prof. Joshua D. Angrist
Danna Azrieli
Dr. Naomi Azrieli O.C.
Dr. Sharon R. Azrieli CQ 
Prof. Shafi Goldwasser
Steven H. Lavin
Marc O. Mayer
Prof. Joel Mokyr
Yehuda Leon Poliker
Prof. Alvin E. Roth
Prof. Sabine Schmidtke

Bublick Prize Recipient:
Prof. Eliezer Rabinovici  

Rothberg Prize Recipient:
Eshel Gat

Honorary Fellowship Recipients:
Ronen Barel
Florence de Botton
Jean-François de Clermont-Tonnerre
Benjamin Horwood 
Dr. John Lourie
Prof. Malcolm Shaw KC
Dr. Wallace N. Weber
Zvi Yekutiel 

Here's a blurry photo that appeared on the front page of the 16 October Haaretz, with the names and nationalities of the honorees (sent to me by Assaf Romm)