Wednesday, August 19, 2026

Deceased-donor initiated kidney exchange chaiins in Italy, after six years

 Kidney exchange in Italy is now making good use of deceased-donor initiated chains.

 

American Journal of Transplantation

Available online 10 August 2026
American Journal of Transplantation

Original Article
Integrating Deceased and Living Donation: Six-Year Outcomes of the Italian Deceased-Donor–Initiated Kidney Paired Exchange (DEC-K) Program

 ABSTRACT
Using a deceased donor (DD) to initiate living-donor (LD) exchange chains can expand access to kidney transplantation in recipients with an HLA or ABO incompatible living donor. The Italian DD-initiated Kidney Paired Exchange (DEC-K) program uses a DD kidney to start a chain among incompatible pairs, ultimately returning a LD kidney to the waiting list. We report the first long-term analysis of this approach worldwide. All DEC-K chains performed in Italy between March 2018 and May 2025 were analyzed. Thirty-four chains generated 84 transplants (34 chain initiating kidneys CIK, 22 from LD, 28 chain-ending kidneys CEK) versus 17 transplants from conventional Kidney Paired Donation (KPD) program in the same period. Five-year outcomes were similar between CIK and LD recipients (eGFR slope: −2.0 mL/min/1.73m2/year, P=0.37; graft survival: log-rank P=0.28). While this approach diverts blood-group O DD kidneys from the general waiting list, potentially affecting non-sensitized candidates, it was designed to address the unmet needs of highly sensitized patients facing years of waiting. In the Italian setting, the DEC-K program successfully initiates LD chains from DD kidneys with outcomes equivalent to LD transplant; implementation should include monitoring of blood-group-specific outcomes and flexible design to accommodate healthcare system priorities.

... 

 "DISCUSSION
The six-year DEC-K experience demonstrates that DD-initiated KPD chains are highly effective in small national pools such as Italy’s, which include about 70 incompatible pairs at a time. Because closed-loop exchanges rarely provide enough matches, especially for blood group O or highly sensitized recipients, open chains initiated by DDs can convert a single graft into multiple sequential transplants without simultaneous multi-center surgery. In our program, 34 DDs generated 84 transplants, corresponding to a threefold increase compared to conventional loops in the Italian KPD. Broader enrollment could further enhance impact, although participation remains limited by concerns about receiving a DD kidney while the paired LD proceeds, underscoring the need for transparent counseling and clear communication about outcomes and equity.
The rationale for DEC-K aligns with models proposed by Melcher and later implemented by Furian, in which a SCD kidney is allocated to an incompatible pair whose LD subsequently donates to another recipient, propagating the chain21, 23, 29. Similar donor-driven chains were pioneered in the United States, where Rees demonstrated that a single altruistic donor could initiate a ten-transplant sequence14. Mathematical modeling by Wang et al.23 supports this approach, showing that allocating just 2-3% of DD to initiate KPD chains could generate several hundred additional transplants annually, with maximum benefit for highly sensitized and blood-group O candidates23. In countries with rare or restricted altruistic donation and small KPD pools, such as Italy, DD initiation is the only practical way to generate compatible matches. Over the past decade, only ten non-directed donors enabled 30 transplants and unlocked 21 incompatible pairs, substantially fewer than DEC-K.

##########

Earlier: 

Monday, April 11, 2016  Using deceased donor kidneys to start living donor kidney exchange chains

 

Tuesday, August 18, 2026

Public attitudes towards deceased organ donation and allocation in china

 Deceased  organ donation in China does not  yet have overwhelming public support although receiving a deceased donor organ transplant does:

Hu, D., Wang, Y., Hu, Q. et al. Public attitudes and preferences on organ donation and allocation in china: a cross-sectional study. Sci Rep 16, 24995 (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-54903-4 

 

 

 

Monday, August 17, 2026

Bra doping at the women’s Tour de France

 I follow the Tour de France, partly out of an interest in performance enhancing drugs.  But from time to time other strategic kinds of doping are also discussed, as in altering the bikes rather than the bike riders.

In this connection, The Tour de France Femmes, the women's Tour, now has a discussion of bra doping, for better aerodynamics:

Bra doping at the women’s Tour de France 

"This year’s Tour de France Femmes has been rocked by allegations that some riders are artificially exaggerating their bust size to gain an aerodynamic advantage.

Several women’s World Tour teams have raised concerns that cyclists on rival teams are padding their sports bras to give them a boost in time trials, according to leading Dutch cycling news site, WielerFlits.

"The practice of “chest fairing” – also known as “bra boosting” or “bra doping” – involves increasing the surface area of the chest to change the airflow around the torso. Other forms of chest fairing include placing a water bottle or radio receiver under your cycling jersey. This can reduce drag, potentially saving valuable seconds in a time trial, where aerodynamics are crucial.

An optimised chest fairing can reduce drag by as much as 3.6%, which could gain a time-trial cyclist at least 0.78 seconds every kilometre, according to research published in the Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics in 2024. “You won’t gain tens of seconds,” said study lead Bert Blocken, an aerodynamics expert at Heriot-Watt University in Scotland. But over a 20- to 30-km time trial, “it could save enough seconds to make the difference”.

 #########

Earlier posts:

Friday, July 25, 2025  Tour de France competitions: conditioning, bikes, and drugs?

 Agence France Presse (AFP) reports on the bike race, and speculates on the historical competition between drug takers and drug testers.

 

Tuesday, July 8, 2025 Doping in the Tour de France: new dimensions

 There was a time when only riders had to be tested for doping, but advances in electric motors and batteries mean that bikes too can be suspect.  However it's the riders who get the most, increasingly sophisticated scrutiny.

Sunday, August 16, 2026

Moral Economics: read the first 30 pages, open access on Google books

 I know you have been just about to buy my book Moral Economics, ever since it came out in May.  But you don't need to charge blindly ahead, you can gather evidence first (something the book strongly suggests is a good general practice:).  You can read the introduction and part of the first chapter (which happens to be on Sex), for free, on google books: https://www.google.com/books/edition/Moral_Economics/rb2CEQAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1

 And here is the table of contents (which, despite the alluring blue colors doesn't in fact contain any links:(

 

###########

And here's an Amazon link, where they stoop to actual commerce: Moral Economics: From Prostitution to Organ Sales, What Controversial Transactions Reveal About How Markets Work  

Saturday, August 15, 2026

Controversial markets in Canada

 I talk with Gemma Boothroyd, about Moral Economics and controversial markets in Canada, including medical aid in dying, about which she has a story of her own.

 CANADALAND #1414 Repugnant Markets: Where Blood is Sold and Kidneys Swapped
“Sometimes the transplants weren't done in a sterile environment. They weren't done in a hospital. They were done in an apartment somewhere. There are some very bad black markets.” - Nobel Laureate economist Alvin Roth 

 Gemma Boothroyd Reporter

"They’re shamed, banned, or driven underground but “repugnant markets” have a way of surviving. Organ sales, MAID, even blood sales fall into the category. Nobel Prize-winning economist Alvin Roth comes to Canadaland to discuss his latest book, Moral Economics: From Prostitution to Organ Sales, What Controversial Transactions Reveal about How Markets Work.

 You can listen here. (but you have to listen to some ads too:(

Further Reading:

 

Host: Gemma Boothroyd

 

Friday, August 14, 2026

True Crime: Illegal markets have great variety (PNAS)

 The forthcoming issue of PNAS (August 18, 2026 | vol. 123 | no. 33) has a big set of papers on illegal markets, with the goal of searching for common features, which turn out to be somewhat elusive.

Illegal markets create untold societal and environmental harm, but they have attracted surprisingly little scholarly attention. This paper explores illegal markets as a class of objects. It considers similarities and differences across markets, with ...

"The raw material for these comparisons mostly comes from the February 2025 Policy and Research on Illegal Markets (PRIM) workshop held at RAND in Santa Monica. The workshop convened 17 experts on nine specific markets, or types of markets. They wrote the market-specific papers contained within this volume."  

This article provides a primer on illegal drug markets, with a focus on the structure and nature of these markets and the enterprises involved. The markets for illegal drugs are large, with annual retail expenditures likely exceeding $100 billion in the ...

"One premise of this special issue is that illegal markets and the supply chains that support them are a worthy topic of scientific inquiry. That turns out to be a novel claim. Illegal markets have simply not been a major topic of interest to economists, the discipline that would most plausibly study them. For example, Nobel laureate Alvin Roth, in his magisterial review of markets and market design, describes illegal markets but offers no specific analytic insights about them (2[A. E. Roth, Marketplaces, markets, and market design. Am. Econ. Rev. 108, 1609–1658 (2018).]). Gary Becker, one of the giants of microeconomics, wrote occasionally about drug markets but forced on them the presumption that they were analytically no different than legal markets (e.g., ref. 3). 

Illegal wildlife markets comprise a complex global economy generating criminal profits while harming biodiversity and livelihoods. The negative externalities from biodiversity loss, ecosystem destabilization, and zoonotic disease risk may be orders of ...

"At least since the third century BCE, when the Edicts of Ashoka prohibited the killing of animals with aesthetic value on the Indian subcontinent, wildlife has been trapped, harvested, and sold in contravention of laws (1). "