Monday, August 17, 2026

Bra doping at the women’s Tour de France

 I follow the Tour de France, partly out of an interest in performance enhancing drugs.  But from time to time other strategic kinds of doping are also discussed, as in altering the bikes rather than the bike riders.

In this connection, The Tour de France Femmes, the women's Tour, now has a discussion of bra doping, for better aerodynamics:

Bra doping at the women’s Tour de France 

"This year’s Tour de France Femmes has been rocked by allegations that some riders are artificially exaggerating their bust size to gain an aerodynamic advantage.

Several women’s World Tour teams have raised concerns that cyclists on rival teams are padding their sports bras to give them a boost in time trials, according to leading Dutch cycling news site, WielerFlits.

"The practice of “chest fairing” – also known as “bra boosting” or “bra doping” – involves increasing the surface area of the chest to change the airflow around the torso. Other forms of chest fairing include placing a water bottle or radio receiver under your cycling jersey. This can reduce drag, potentially saving valuable seconds in a time trial, where aerodynamics are crucial.

An optimised chest fairing can reduce drag by as much as 3.6%, which could gain a time-trial cyclist at least 0.78 seconds every kilometre, according to research published in the Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics in 2024. “You won’t gain tens of seconds,” said study lead Bert Blocken, an aerodynamics expert at Heriot-Watt University in Scotland. But over a 20- to 30-km time trial, “it could save enough seconds to make the difference”.

 #########

Earlier posts:

Friday, July 25, 2025  Tour de France competitions: conditioning, bikes, and drugs?

 Agence France Presse (AFP) reports on the bike race, and speculates on the historical competition between drug takers and drug testers.

 

Tuesday, July 8, 2025 Doping in the Tour de France: new dimensions

 There was a time when only riders had to be tested for doping, but advances in electric motors and batteries mean that bikes too can be suspect.  However it's the riders who get the most, increasingly sophisticated scrutiny.

Sunday, August 16, 2026

Moral Economics: read the first 30 pages, open access on Google books

 I know you have been just about to buy my book Moral Economics, ever since it came out in May.  But you don't need to charge blindly ahead, you can gather evidence first (something the book strongly suggests is a good general practice:).  You can read the introduction and part of the first chapter (which happens to be on Sex), for free, on google books: https://www.google.com/books/edition/Moral_Economics/rb2CEQAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1

 And here is the table of contents (which, despite the alluring blue colors doesn't in fact contain any links:(

 

###########

And here's an Amazon link, where they stoop to actual commerce: Moral Economics: From Prostitution to Organ Sales, What Controversial Transactions Reveal About How Markets Work  

Saturday, August 15, 2026

Controversial markets in Canada

 I talk with Gemma Boothroyd, about Moral Economics and controversial markets in Canada, including medical aid in dying, about which she has a story of her own.

 CANADALAND #1414 Repugnant Markets: Where Blood is Sold and Kidneys Swapped
“Sometimes the transplants weren't done in a sterile environment. They weren't done in a hospital. They were done in an apartment somewhere. There are some very bad black markets.” - Nobel Laureate economist Alvin Roth 

 Gemma Boothroyd Reporter

"They’re shamed, banned, or driven underground but “repugnant markets” have a way of surviving. Organ sales, MAID, even blood sales fall into the category. Nobel Prize-winning economist Alvin Roth comes to Canadaland to discuss his latest book, Moral Economics: From Prostitution to Organ Sales, What Controversial Transactions Reveal about How Markets Work.

 You can listen here. (but you have to listen to some ads too:(

Further Reading:

 

Host: Gemma Boothroyd

 

Friday, August 14, 2026

True Crime: Illegal markets have great variety (PNAS)

 The forthcoming issue of PNAS (August 18, 2026 | vol. 123 | no. 33) has a big set of papers on illegal markets, with the goal of searching for common features, which turn out to be somewhat elusive.

Illegal markets create untold societal and environmental harm, but they have attracted surprisingly little scholarly attention. This paper explores illegal markets as a class of objects. It considers similarities and differences across markets, with ...

"The raw material for these comparisons mostly comes from the February 2025 Policy and Research on Illegal Markets (PRIM) workshop held at RAND in Santa Monica. The workshop convened 17 experts on nine specific markets, or types of markets. They wrote the market-specific papers contained within this volume."  

This article provides a primer on illegal drug markets, with a focus on the structure and nature of these markets and the enterprises involved. The markets for illegal drugs are large, with annual retail expenditures likely exceeding $100 billion in the ...

"One premise of this special issue is that illegal markets and the supply chains that support them are a worthy topic of scientific inquiry. That turns out to be a novel claim. Illegal markets have simply not been a major topic of interest to economists, the discipline that would most plausibly study them. For example, Nobel laureate Alvin Roth, in his magisterial review of markets and market design, describes illegal markets but offers no specific analytic insights about them (2[A. E. Roth, Marketplaces, markets, and market design. Am. Econ. Rev. 108, 1609–1658 (2018).]). Gary Becker, one of the giants of microeconomics, wrote occasionally about drug markets but forced on them the presumption that they were analytically no different than legal markets (e.g., ref. 3). 

Illegal wildlife markets comprise a complex global economy generating criminal profits while harming biodiversity and livelihoods. The negative externalities from biodiversity loss, ecosystem destabilization, and zoonotic disease risk may be orders of ...

"At least since the third century BCE, when the Edicts of Ashoka prohibited the killing of animals with aesthetic value on the Indian subcontinent, wildlife has been trapped, harvested, and sold in contravention of laws (1). " 

 

 

Thursday, August 13, 2026

The Paradox of Protection: Overregulation Threatens Living Kidney Donation in Mexico,

 Protections intended to thwart organ trafficking may inadvertently also "protect" legitimate patients and donors from receiving life-saving medical care.

The Paradox of Protection: How Overregulation Threatens Living Kidney Donation in Mexico, by Francisco J. Reyna-Sepulveda and Javier Sanchez-Maldonado, Transplantation, Publish Ahead of Print, July 27, 2026. | DOI: 10.1097/TP.0000000000005860 

 

 

"Globally, unrelated and nondirected living kidney donations have become important mechanisms for expanding transplant access.1 Structured programs in the United States and Spain support unrelated donation through rigorous psychological evaluation, independent donor advocacy, and transparent oversight systems.3,4 For example, nondirected donors serve as critical initiators of kidney paired donation chains, substantially amplifying transplant opportunities beyond a single donor-recipient pair.3-5 However, a recent regulatory shift in Mexico threatens to effectively preclude these pathways in practice, leaving living kidney donors (including living liver donors) with genuine altruistic intent declined and vulnerable patients losing critical access to life-saving transplants.

"WHEN ALTRUISM REQUIRES PROOF
"On August 4, 2023, the National Transplant Center and the Federal Commission for Protection against Health Risks issued a High Health Directive (Alta Directiva Sanitaria), establishing mandatory standardized protocols for Mexican transplant centers.6 This directive emerged in response to well-documented regional concerns regarding organ trafficking, transplant tourism, regulatory gaps, and the “legal simulation” of donor-recipient relationships. These concerns are entirely legitimate and align with the principles articulated by the Declaration of Istanbul on Organ Trafficking and Transplant Tourism.7 

...

"Although the directive does not explicitly outlaw nondirected donation, its evidentiary requirements effectively preclude it at the committee level. As a result, viable donor candidates may be categorically declined for regulatory rather than medical reasons.  

...

"Although data isolating the exact proportion of donor evaluations declined solely for documentation rather than medical or psychosocial factors are currently unavailable, Mexican National Registry data highlight a concerning sign.9 During the 12 mo preceding the directive’s publication, 438 unrelated living donor kidney transplants were performed nationally, compared with 354 during the subsequent 12 mo—a 19% decline.

...

"This directive severely limits Mexico’s potential to establish domestic paired-exchange networks or participate in cross-border paired kidney exchanges. The Global Kidney Exchange model, for instance, incorporates pairs from middle-income countries into US-initiated chains to overcome financial and immunological barriers.10 This approach has been accompanied by ethical discussion in the transplant literature, particularly regarding concerns about potential inducements and unintended exploitation.10" 

...

"Ultimately, the critical question is not whether expanding living kidney donation should be permitted, but whether a transplant system can be considered ethically complete if a viable living kidney donor candidate is categorically declined for regulatory rather than medical reasons.

Wednesday, August 12, 2026

Peter Coy on Moral Economics in The Free Press

 The Nobel Laureate Who’d Buy Your Kidney
What is bad about prostitution? Why is it wrong to eat horses? Al Roth’s latest book asks the most provocative moral questions. He gave The Free Press some of his answers.

By Peter Coy 

"I was a little surprised to find out that Roth has a wide streak of provocation in his personality. It comes across in his new book, Moral Economics: From Prostitution to Organ Sales, What Controversial Transactions Reveal about How Markets Work, published in May. In a mild, just-asking-questions tone, Roth digs into one prohibited or controversial activity after another: buying sex, eating horses, selling organs, assisting suicide, carrying a stranger’s baby. He asks why many of these activities are prohibited or restricted even though some people clearly want them. And he thinks about whether it’s possible to design markets for them in a way that preserves people’s freedom to transact while protecting those who don’t want to. 

...

"Roth entertains so many ideas that others strenuously resist that I asked if he calls himself a libertarian. No, he said. “People who call themselves libertarians often don’t like market regulation of any sort,” he said. “But I’m a market designer. I think that good regulations help markets work well.” Cigarettes and alcohol, for example. They can be sold, but not to children. That’s a reasonable balance. 

...

"If you want to design markets that enable beneficial exchanges while protecting the vulnerable, you may have to persuade people that a market in some repugnant good or service is tolerable. Roth seems to have taken on that task in Moral Economics. He never told me what to think. He just asked me what I think, and to think about what I think. It’s an economist’s kind of mischief—relentlessly, cheerfully inquisitive about the rules we’ve decided to live by but have never quite explained to ourselves.
Kidney transactions don’t seem so repugnant to me anymore. Would I sell a kidney to a stranger? Um, maybe, some day. Would I buy a kidney from a stranger if I really needed one? Hell, yeah."

Tuesday, August 11, 2026

Civil society, state and market by Bowles and Carlin in Annual Review of Economics

 Sam Bowles and Wendy Carlin propose that we should think of civil society as the third leg in regulating economic life, along with government and markets. (They use kidney exchange as an example to indicate what they mean.) 

The Governance Triangle: Economic interactions in civil society, the state, and the market, Bowles, Samuel; Carlin, Wendy; (2026), Annual Review of Economics

"Abstract: Interactions in civil society – in firms, families, neighborhoods, identity groups, and other face-to-face settings – have in common that relationships are personal and enduring, and as a result, identity and other-regarding preferences are important motivations (for better or worse). Here we add civil society to markets and states as a third form of governance of the economy, creating the governance triangle. We provide evidence that themes related to civil society have assumed substantially greater importance in economic research since the 1970s. We use a standard principal-agent model of employment in private firms to reveal three characteristics of interactions in civil society: the role of face-to-face interactions, social norms, and the private exercise of power. We show that market failures and other coordination problems can sometimes be more successfully addressed by civil society than by state or market governance. Civil society may have comparative institutional advantage where information available to state and market actors is limited, restricting the reach of complete contracts and enforceable government regulations, conditional on conflicts of interest being modest. When based on us-versus-them forms of identity, however, civil society governance may promote preferences antithetical to a liberal and democratic society." 

 

 

"To illustrate the meaning of points in the triangle, we have placed the kidney exchange model proposed by Alvin Roth and his collaborators (the red dot) in the governance triangle ((Roth et al 2006).) They designed a mechanism connecting those needing a kidney replacement to altruistic donors of kidneys. Such donors are most often an immediate family member of someone whose kidney is not a match for their loved-one needing the transplant. Roth’s algorithm enables long chains of unrelated matched donors and recipients, thereby widening access to transplants because they do not have to be conducted bilaterally (the donor giving to a particular match) and contemporaneously.


"As an illustration of the nexus of synergistic institutions in the triangle, we represent the kidney donor mechanism, the red point, by a weight of 0.3 on the state (which regulates the exchanges, including prohibiting sales), 0.2 on the market (which provides associated medical services), and 0.5 on civil society (for the centrality of altruistic and ethical motivations underlying the initial contribution of the kidney.)... By relating the characteristics of behaviour and the allocation mechanisms involved to the three pure types, other institutions and policies can be located inside the triangle."

########

Note that this representation in a triangle is in a barycentric coordinate system, which has only become a readily recognizable tool in various applications in economics in the last half century or so.  Wikipedia dates their introduction to 1827.