Justin
M. Rao and David H. Reiley
|
"We
estimate that American firms and consumers experience costs of almost $20
billion annually due to spam. Our figure is more conservative than the $50
billion figure often cited by other authors, and we also note that the figure
would be much higher if it were not for private investment in anti-spam
technology by firms, which we detail further on. Based on the work of crafty
computer scientists who have infiltrated and monitored spammers' activity, we
estimate that spammers and spam-advertised merchants collect gross worldwide
revenues on the order of $200 million per year. Thus, the "externality
ratio" of external costs to internal benefits for spam is around 100:1.
In this paper, we start by describing the history of the market for spam,
highlighting the strategic cat-and-mouse game between spammers and email
providers. We discuss how th e market structure for spamming has evolved from
a diffuse network of independent spammers running their own online stores to
a highly specialized industry featuring a well-organized network of
merchants, spam distributors (botnets), and spammers (or
"advertisers"). We then put the spam market's externality ratio of
100 into context by comparing it to other activities with negative externalities.
Lastly, we evaluate various policy proposals designed to solve the spam
problem, cautioning that these proposals may err in assuming away the
spammers' ability to adapt."
|
Tuesday, August 7, 2012
The Economics of Spam by Rao and Reiley
In the latest Journal of Economic Perspectives: The Economics of Spam (open access).
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment