Saturday, June 21, 2025

The job description of intimacy coordinator (for sex scenes in films and plays)

 There's a new profession being practiced, akin to what stunt coordinators have long done in films, to try to keep the actors and stuntmen and women safe.  Intimacy coordinators coordinate sex scenes. 

Here's the story in the New Yorker:

How I Learned to Become an Intimacy Coördinator
At a sex-choreography workshop, a writer discovered a world of Instant Chemistry exercises, penis pouches, and nudity riders to train for Hollywood’s most controversial job.  By Jennifer Wilson 

" It is a new job—so new, in fact, that the union offers a definition on its website: “an advocate, a liaison between actors and production, and a movement coach and/or choreographer” of sex scenes. 

...

"Intimacy coördinators are one of the most visible “wins” of the #MeToo movement. It’s no surprise that the public has begun to perceive a director’s or a star’s attitude toward them as a proxy for his or her attitude about consent and abuse of power.

...

"Intimacy coördinators are part of the gig economy and thus susceptible to the same forces they are hired to mitigate. “We talk about the power dynamics that actors are under,” Jessica Steinrock, the C.E.O. of Intimacy Directors and Coordinators, the largest training program in the industry, said. “We are also under a significant amount of power dynamics.” She went on, “At the end of the day, sticking up for an actor and saying, ‘Hey, no, we can’t film this’—there’s a real chance that we’re going to get fired, and there’s really nothing we can do about it.”

##########

And the business of coordinating portrayals of intimacy has it's own journal: The Journal of Consent-Based Performance

Friday, June 20, 2025

Jewish cemetery and Pinkas synagogue in Prague

 During our visit to Prague in May we visited the Old Jewish Cemetery, crowded with the dead from the historic Jewish Ghetto.


 We also visited the Pinkas synagogue, whose walls are covered with the names of those murdered in the Shoah, with their birth dates and death dates.  The birth dates reveal a vibrant community, from small children to senior citizens.  The dates of death are all from 1942 to 1944.






 

Thursday, June 19, 2025

Hate crimes in the United States

 The data graphic on hate crimes below is from the NYT editorial (and dates back to 2023).

Antisemitism Is an Urgent Problem. Too Many People Are Making Excuses.
June 14, 2025


 

 

Wednesday, June 18, 2025

Roland Fryer on the Economics of Slavery (in the WSJ)

 The Economics of Slavery
Probing the incentives and institutions that kept slavery alive can help us value what freedom means
,  by Roland Fryer 

"Learning what slavery entailed is enough to horrify us; understanding why it endured demands economics. Moral repulsion at reducing people to property can—and must—coexist with the need to explain how such barbarism flourished in a nation that proclaimed “all men are created equal.” Only by probing the incentives and institutions that kept slavery alive can we fully appreciate what freedom means.

...

"Slavery endured not only because society condoned it but also because, for slaveholders, it paid. Fogel and Engerman overturned the then-fashionable view that bondage was an economically backward form of racist exploitation, manned by an idle workforce that dragged the South down. Their data revealed a colder truth: For those who owned people, slavery was the most profitable and therefore most rational labor system on offer. Recognizing the profit calculus behind slavery doesn’t dilute its moral horror—it sharpens it. It exposes how market incentives can entrench inhumanity and how the lure of profit can eclipse compassion.

...

"Teaching that slavery was simply racial exploitation differs from showing that it was capitalism run amok, an incentive-driven system that targeted black people because doing so maximized profit. Both interpretations acknowledge slavery’s brutality, but the economic framing sheds light on how incentives can be reshaped, pointing to concrete ways the future can be brighter."

Tuesday, June 17, 2025

8th Interdisciplinary Market Studies Workshop (IMSW), June 16 – June 18

 Markets are such an important way in which humans interact that I'm always cheered to note that economists aren't alone in studying them. (And studying them is different from simply appreciating them...:). Here's an interdisciplinary conference just finishing up that doesn't seem to involve many economists at all.

the program is here:

8th Interdisciplinary Market Studies Workshop (IMSW), June 16 – June 18, 2025, Stockholm School of Economics

 

 And here's the very interesting call for papers, which I've quoted below the link:

The 8th Interdisciplinary Market Studies Workshop
Theme: Nordic Noir – Exploring the Dark Sides of Markets
 

"Since its first meeting in Sigtuna in 2010, IMSW has gathered scholars interested in the creation and operation of markets. At the heart of the workshop are empirical accounts of mundane market practices as well as market formation and change processes. Over the years, discussions at IMSW have highlighted the variability of market arrangements and outcomes, paid close attention to the metrologies and evaluative practices linked to markets, scrutinized the power in and of markets, and engaged in speculations on the possibility of better markets. While the ethos of the workshop has always been to question the benevolence and neutrality of markets, we believe that as IMSW now returns to Stockholm, the time is ripe for something a bit different. We therefore call for an even more explicit focus on the negative externalities, excesses, and ethical impotency of markets. As befits the return of IMSW to the land of Nordic noir, we invite contributions that explore the dark sides of markets.

Perhaps more than ever before, markets provoke concern. The climate crisis is intimately connected with the current economic system – and many find it easier to imagine the end of the world than the end of capitalism. The growing influence of financial markets leads to the hegemony of narrow forms of valuation and the severing of many human ties. Marketized technologies pose threats to democracy through their production of both ignorance and further polarization. Digital market infrastructures work as mechanisms of surveillance but also facilitate the formation and operation of markets beyond the reach of regulatory interventions. The marketization of areas such as education and healthcare contributes to problems of unequal access, and bureaucratization makes structures inflexible to change or improvement. These and other similar developments certainly warrant the attention of the market studies community.

As IMSW turns 15, we propose, in the spirit of the gloomiest, moodiest instincts of adolescence, a side-step from constructivist market studies to "destructivist" market studies. This challenge involves new markets to study, new verbs to master, and new questions to ask. Instead of the very respectable markets usually studied by market studies scholars, we encourage the exploration of taboo markets, illegal markets, and repugnant markets. In addition to studies of imagining, designing, and maintaining markets, we would like to see inquiries into destroying, deceiving, threatening, and scheming in markets. We look forward to submissions addressing questions such as: What role do markets play in the current rather destructive time capsule? How are affects such as hate, fear, loathing, and shame provoked and used in markets? What effects do markets have when they create insiders and outsiders? How do market epistemologies help actors mobilize obscurity and opacity in society?

Markets have been lauded as mechanisms for optimal resource allocation and denounced as structures of oppression. Beyond this polemic debate, the workshop’s historical rooting in STS and ANT serves as a reminder to look beyond contestations and trace the practices (and not only the ideologies) that (in)form them. In short, the field of interdisciplinary market studies has responded by assuming a position where both “Le bon Dieu” and “The Devil” are to be found in the details. In this vein, we look forward to a workshop full of constructive discussions. While finding solutions to the problems identified may not always be within our reach, a sound introspection, reflection, and mapping of the values we guard definitely is.  

Submission topics

We particularly invite submissions that address or are related to any of the following topics, though we are open to other relevant areas of work:

The Externalities of Markets:

In line with the established approach of studying market framing, we invite submissions that explore the production of negative externalities and unexpected consequences of markets. This includes studies of markets for exchange objects with negative effects (i.e.,‘bads’ for sale instead of ‘goods’), human and non-human suffering caused by markets, as well as attempts to make visible and address negative externalities.

The Excesses of Markets:

Contemporary markets are characterized by excesses such as overconsumption, waste, and luxury indulgence. We invite submissions that explore the processes and practices giving rise to and making visible these and other excesses. This includes studying the setting of standards and norms related to sufficiency and excess, whether in relation to economic growth or consumer lifestyles.

The “Otherness” of Markets:

In contemporary market society, having access to markets can have decisive impact. For markets to operate, frames and/or boundaries need to be established, but boundaries (by default) also create insiders and outsiders. The “Otherness” of markets invites explorations of the effects of boundaries, focusing on the consequences of being an “outsider” with identifiable topics such as poverty, gender discrimination, and inequality.

The Ignorance of Markets:

Recent decades have seen increased trust in and skepticism towards knowledge produced in and around markets. Sophisticated tools improve forecasting and knowledge sharing, yet as recent failures of prediction have shown (financial crisis, Covid-pandemic, US election 2016) their conclusions can be arbitrary, biased, and ideologically motivated. We invite submissions that explore the production of ignorance and “non-knowledge” in markets as well as their hidden, discreet, and invisible dimensions.  

The Repugnance of Markets:

We invite submissions exploring themes of moral outrage, taboo, and disgust in and around markets. This includes the study of illegal and/or illicit markets, but also of variations in the legal and moral categorization of market phenomena across national, (sub)cultural, and temporal settings.

The Repair of Markets:

The dark sides of markets give rise not only to despair but also to various efforts at repair. The heterogeneity and pliability of markets remain central tenets in market studies and can be usefully applied also to situations of concern and discontent. We therefore invite contributions that explore the work of proposing alternative market arrangements and/or alternatives to markets, creating better markets, and caring for markets. "

 

HT: Koray Caliskan 

Informed consent and mortal sin, in the case of Medical Aid in Dying

 Studying morally contested transactions doesn't always suggest paths by which consensus might be reached. It often suggests that conflicting views may be irreconcilable

That seems to be the case for the growing legalization of Medical Aid in Dying (MAID, also called medically assisted suicide), about which I've recently blogged several times.  

MAID laws face determined religious opposition.  When Hawaii legalized MAID in 2018, the Catholic Diocese of Honolulu issued some guidance to clergy pointing out that the law's requirements for informed consent seemed to coincide with the requirements for a sin to be a mortal sin.

 Diocese of Honolulu November 5, 2018: Instruction Regarding Sacraments and Funerals In Situations Involving Physician Assisted Suicide for Clergy, Parish Staff and Ministers to the Sick and Homebound
“Everyone is responsible for his life before God who has given it to him. It is God who remains the sovereign Master of life. We are obliged to accept life gratefully and preserve it for his honor and the salvation of our souls. We are stewards, not owners, of the life God has entrusted to us. It is not ours to dispose of” (Catechism of the Catholic Church [CCC], no. 2280)

...

7."For a sin to be a mortal sin, three conditions must be fulfilled:

  •  the matter must be grave,
  •  the person must have knowledge of the gravity of the matter, and
  •  the person must freely choose the matter after sufficient deliberation (see CCC, nos. 1857-1859).

8."The process required by the State of Hawaii for a person seeking medically assisted suicide is meant to guarantee that he or she is fully informed and has made a deliberate consent, thus likely fulfilling the requirements for mortal sin.


9." If a person dies in mortal sin without contrition, such final impenitence results in the “exclusion from Christ's kingdom and the eternal death of hell, for our freedom has the power to make choices for ever, with no turning back” (CCC, no. 1861; see no. 1864)

 

HT: Julio Elias

Monday, June 16, 2025

Axel Ockenfels to head new Adenauer School of Government in Cologne

 Here's the press release:

University of Cologne founds Adenauer School of Government 

"On 5 June 2025, the University of Cologne and the non-profit Alfred Landecker Foundation, founded by the Reimann family, signed a cooperation agreement to establish the Adenauer School of Government (ASG). The aim of the ASG is to establish itself as a leading, non-partisan center for public policy, governance and administrative sciences that helps to shape relevant developments in economics and other research fields. The school will be funded for an unlimited term, with an initial budget of ten million euros per year.

...

"Professor Dr Axel Ockenfels was appointed head of the Adenauer School of Government. He is Professor of Economics at the University of Cologne and Director at the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods in Bonn. In addition to establishing the School as a central academic institution and preparing a study and research programme, the university will also initiate the first appointment procedures in the coming months."

#########

Here's the new school's new web page: Adenauer School of Government 

Sunday, June 15, 2025

European workshop on Market Design, June 16-17

 The workshop takes place at ZEW – Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research  L7, 168161 Mannheim

European Workshop on Market Design #5favicon


16 — 17 June 2025

Program

Download Program (pdf)


Monday, June 16

9:00 - 09:25Welcome and Coffee
9:25 - 09:30Opening Remarks
9:30 - 11:30
Session 1: Mechanism Design
Chair: Marion Ott
Marco Ottaviani (Bocconi University with Nenad Kos): Self-Selection, Evaluation, and Optimal Ordeals

Laura Doval (Columbia Business School, with Alex Smolin): Calibrated Mechanism Design
11:30 - 12:00Coffee Break
12:00 - 13:00
Session 2: Natural Language Equilibrium
Chair: Olivier Bos
Philip Reny (University of Chicago): Natural Language Equilibrium: Off-Path Conventions I
13:00 - 14:30
Lunch & Posters
Yulia Evsyukova (ZEW Mannheim): Selling Information with Free Samples

Daniel Linnenbrink (ZEW Mannheim & Mannheim University): Pay-as-bid Auctions with Private Information

Cyril Rouault (ENS Paris-Saclay, CEPS): Job Matching and Affirmative Action: The Impact of Transfer Policies

Philip Zilke (University of Muenster): Funding mechanisms for green projects
14:30 - 16:30
Session 3: Competition
Chair: Nicolas Fugger
Francisco Poggi (Mannheim University): tba

Anna Sanktjohanser (Toulouse School of Economics, with Johannes Hörner & James Dana): Competition and Consumer Search
16:30 - 17:00Coffee Break
17:00 - 18:00
Chair: Olivier Bos
Lecture in Memory of Nora Szech

Thomas Mariotti (Toulouse School of Economics, with Andrea Attar & François Salanié): Competitive Nonlinear Pricing under Adverse Selection
19:00Social Dinner (by invitation)

Tuesday, June 17

9:00Coffee
9:30 - 11:30
Session 5: Matching 1
Chair: Thilo Klein
Karolina Vocke (University of Innsbruck): Stability in Matching Markets

Vincent Meisner (Humboldt University of Berlin, with Müge Süer, Michel Tolksdorf & Sokol Tominaj): Confidence in Strategy-Proof Matching Mechanisms
11:30 - 12:00Coffee Break
12:00 - 13:00
Session 6: Screening
Chair: Daniil Larionov
Patrick Lahr (ENS Paris-Saclay, CEPS, with Axel Niemeyer): Extreme Points in Multi-Dimensional Screening
13:00 - 14:30Lunch & Posters
14:30 - 16:30
Session 7: Information Disclosure
Chair: Daniil Larionov
Paula Onuchic (London School of Economics, with Aurélien Salas): Disclosing Proxies

Ferdinand Pieroth (Yale University, with Carlo M. Cusumano): Due Diligence in Common Value Auctions
16:30 - 17:00Coffee Break
17:00 - 18:00
Session 8: Matching II
Chair: tba
Tina Danting Zhang (UC Davis, with Ester Camina & Andrés Carvajal): Satisficing Matching
19:00City Tour (by invitation)