Congrats to Dan Friedman and Ryan Oprea, for the news that came this morning about their 2012 AER paper A continuous dilemma. Here's the email:
"Dear colleagues,
We are happy to announce the winner of the 2013 Exeter Prize for
the best paper published in the previous calendar year in a peer-reviewed
journal in the fields of Experimental Economics, Behavioural Economics and
Decision Theory.
The winner is Daniel Friedman and Ryan Opera for their paper “A Continuous Dilemma” by published in American Economic Review.
This paper is an excellent complementary use of theory and experiments that significantly adds to our understanding of one of the fundamental problems in game theory. It is an important study that will stand the test of time.
The winning paper was selected by the panel of Glenn Harrison (Georgia State University), Izhak Gilboa (Tel Aviv University) and Shmuel Zamir (Hebrew University and the University of Exeter).
"Dear colleagues,
The winner is Daniel Friedman and Ryan Opera for their paper “A Continuous Dilemma” by published in American Economic Review.
This paper is an excellent complementary use of theory and experiments that significantly adds to our understanding of one of the fundamental problems in game theory. It is an important study that will stand the test of time.
The winning paper was selected by the panel of Glenn Harrison (Georgia State University), Izhak Gilboa (Tel Aviv University) and Shmuel Zamir (Hebrew University and the University of Exeter).
The
winners receive 3000 pounds. In addition, a representative of them will be
visiting the University of Exeter in May to receive the award and give a
lecture.
This
year was exceptionally competitive with a large number of excellent
nominations. As stated above the best paper was awarded from the following
fields: Experimental Economics, Behavioural
Economics and Decision Theory and papers qualified under one of
the following categories:
1. Any
paper that involves either lab or field experiments.
2. Any
purely theoretical paper that involves "behavioral" theory
(for
example, non-expected utility).
3. Any
empirical work that shows evidence for behavioral models (that
fit
under 2) or tests/rejects models (that fit under 2).
Miguel
Fonseca
Todd
Kaplan
Eva
Poen"
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.