I don't doubt that every year people are nervous about the residency Match, and worries this year are related to the special situation of the Covid pandemic, in which interviews will be remote.
Irene Wapnir forwards the following:
From the AM College of Surgeons Bulletin: Interview crisis:
It May Be Too Late toAvoid a Crisis in the Surgery Match This Year
Ronald
J. Weigel, MD, PhD, FACS; Steven C. Stain, MD, FACS; and L. Scott Levin, MD,
FACS, FAOA
Are
you hearing that outstanding medical students applying for surgical residencies
are being wait-listed for an interview at top training programs? The problem
may be yet another unfortunate consequence of the COVID-19 pandemic.
In
normal years, programs have cancellations because there is a physical
limitation for how many interviews a student can do. This year, the pandemic
forced programs to go to virtual interviews, and a small group of top students nationally appear to be
filling all the interview slots for the top programs. If this is true, then
many of those programs may go unfilled in the match.
For
example, if the average number of interviews offered by a program is 100, and
these programs are all competing for the same pool of 100 intern applicants,
the pool of top students interviewed may be too small to fill all the slots in
these programs. Additionally, the current interview process may create disadvantages
for minority applicants and students from schools that are not considered
"top tier."
With
virtual interviews
allowing students to interview at a larger number of programs, we may need a different system
nationally for the allocation of interview slots, such as rolling acceptances
for interviews with students being required to commit only to a set number of
programs, which would allow additional students the opportunity to be
interviewed. The solution will require program directors and surgical leaders
nationally to discuss this issue. It may be too late to avoid a crisis in the
match this year.
Surgery Match:
Considerations and Possible Solutions
In
their article, "It May Be Too Late to Avoid a Crisis in the Surgery Match,"
Drs. Weigel, Stain and Levin highlight challenges with this year's surgery
match. Regarding this, the ACS proposes that program directors, deans and
chairs, as well as candidates, consider the following to ensure as fair and
equitable a process as possible during this extraordinary time:
Program
Directors, Deans, Chairs
- Review the consequences that oversubscribing to slots
has to programs and other candidates with students
- Don't offer slots to more candidates until those
offered have a reasonable time to respond
- Make lists of candidates of interest who are not
interviewed to ensure slots are offered when available
Candidates
- Consider limiting
the number of interviews scheduled to a reasonable amount. Consider the impact on
your colleagues of taking up too many interview slots—be fair to other
applicants
- Release interview slots if you know you will not use
them
- Release slots when you have completed enough interviews
and experienced reciprocal interest that you are confident you have a
well-prepared rank list
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.